Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sudha Devi and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corpn.

Sudha Devi and ors. vs Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corpn.

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Sep 09, 1997
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/761148

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 738 of 1994
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 15,000/- on the account of loss of consortium and love, whereas the three children of the deceased are entitled to Rs.

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudha Devi and ors.

Advocate K.N. Tiwari, Adv.

Respondent

Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corpn.

Advocate Virendra Agarwal, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In
1998ACJ941

Excerpt

- - 15,000/- on the account of loss of consortium and love, whereas the three children of the deceased are entitled to rs.d.c. dalela, j.1. this is an appeal against the award dated 5.3.1994 of the learned motor accidents claims tribunal, jaipur city, jaipur, (for short 'the tribunal'), passed in m.a.c.t. case no. 1064 of 1991. the learned tribunal has awarded a total compensation of rs. 2,31,000/- to the claimants-appellants. this appeal has been filed for enhancement of the award. it is admitted by both the sides at bar before me that the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 28. according to the second schedule of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the multiplier at this age should be 18. the learned tribunal has determined the multiplier as 15. therefore, it requires to be 18.2. the learned tribunal has determined the loss of dependency as rs. 1,200/- p.m. the loss of dependency with reference to multiplier 18, would be rs. 1,200/- x 12 x 18 = rs. 2,59,200/-. the widow of the deceased is entitled to a compensation of rs. 15,000/- on the account of loss of consortium and love, whereas the three children of the deceased are entitled to rs. 5,000/- each, on account of the loss of fatherly affection and care. thus, the total amount of compensation comes to rs. 2,59,200/- + rs. 15,000/- + rs. 5,000 + rs. 5,000/- + rs. 5,000/- = rs. 2,89,200. the award is, therefore, required to be enhanced to this extent only.3. no other point has been raised and argued before me by the parties.4. in the result, this appeal is partly allowed. the total amount of compensation is enhanced to rs. 2,89,200/- from the total amount of compensation of rs. 2,31,000/- as awarded by the learned tribunal. to this extent, the award shall stand modified. other part, terms and conditions of the award are maintained.

Full Judgment

D.C. Dalela, J.

1. This is an appeal against the award dated 5.3.1994 of the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur, (for short 'the Tribunal'), passed in M.A.C.T. Case No. 1064 of 1991. The learned Tribunal has awarded a total compensation of Rs. 2,31,000/- to the claimants-appellants. This appeal has been filed for enhancement of the award. It is admitted by both the sides at Bar before me that the age of the deceased at the time of accident was 28. According to the Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the multiplier at this age should be 18. The learned Tribunal has determined the multiplier as 15. Therefore, it requires to be 18.

2. The learned Tribunal has determined the loss of dependency as Rs. 1,200/- p.m. The loss of dependency with reference to multiplier 18, would be Rs. 1,200/- x 12 x 18 = Rs. 2,59,200/-. The widow of the deceased is entitled to a compensation of Rs. 15,000/- on the account of loss of consortium and love, whereas the three children of the deceased are entitled to Rs. 5,000/- each, on account of the loss of fatherly affection and care. Thus, the total amount of compensation comes to Rs. 2,59,200/- + Rs. 15,000/- + Rs. 5,000 + Rs. 5,000/- + Rs. 5,000/- = Rs. 2,89,200. The award is, therefore, required to be enhanced to this extent only.

3. No other point has been raised and argued before me by the parties.

4. In the result, this appeal is partly allowed. The total amount of compensation is enhanced to Rs. 2,89,200/- from the total amount of compensation of Rs. 2,31,000/- as awarded by the learned Tribunal. To this extent, the award shall stand modified. Other part, terms and conditions of the award are maintained.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial