Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hariya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Hariya vs State of Rajasthan

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 22, 1993
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/760784

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 37 of 1992
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 302 and Criminal Procedure Code--Section 439--Bail--6 witnesses declared hostile--Completion of trial to take time--Held, court is inclined to grant bail.;Six witnesses have been declared hostile including the two eye witnesses namely, PW 3 Kikaram once PW 9 Mangi The total 31 prosecution witnes...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hariya

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In
1993WLN(UC)72a

Excerpt

penal code - section 302 and criminal procedure code--section 439--bail--6 witnesses declared hostile--completion of trial to take time--held, court is inclined to grant bail.;six witnesses have been declared hostile including the two eye witnesses namely, pw 3 kikaram once pw 9 mangi the total 31 prosecution witnesses are to be examined. the examination of rest of the witnesses will take time in completion of the trial.;i am inclined to grant him bail.;bail granted - section 2(k), 2(1), 7 & 40 & juvenile justice (care and protection of children) rules, 2007, rule 12 & 98 & juvenile justice act, 1986, section 2(h): [altamas kabir & cyriac joseph, jj] determination as to juvenile - appellant was found to have completed the age of 16 years and 13 days on the date of alleged occurrence - appellant was arrested on 30.11.1998 when the 1986 act was in force and under clause (h) of section 2 a juvenile was described to mean a child who had not attained the age of sixteen years or a girl who had not attained the age of eighteen years - it is with the enactment of the juvenile justice act, 2000, that in section 2(k) a juvenile or child was defined to mean a child who had not completed eighteen years of a ge which was given prospective prospect - appellant was about sixteen years of age on the date of commission of the alleged offence and had not completed eighteen years of age when the juvenile justice act, 2000, came into force - juvenile act, of 2000 has been given retrospective effect by rule 12 of juvenile justice rule, 2007 - as such, accused has to be treated as juvenile under the said act. y.r. meena, j.1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned public prosecutor for the state.2. so far ten witnesses are examined. six witnesses have been declared hostile including two eye witnesses namely, pw 3 kikaram and pw 9 mangi the total 31 prosecution witnesses are to be examined. the examination of rest of the witnesses will take time in completion of the trial.3. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to grant him bail. hence, it is ordered that the petitioner, hariya rabari be enlarged on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of rs. 25,000/- cash to the notification of addl. sessions judge bali for the appearance in that court on the next date of hearing and as end when called upon to do so.

Full Judgment

Y.R. Meena, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. So far ten witnesses are examined. Six witnesses have been declared hostile including two eye witnesses namely, PW 3 Kikaram and PW 9 Mangi The total 31 prosecution witnesses are to be examined. The examination of rest of the witnesses will take time in completion of the trial.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant him bail. Hence, it is ordered that the petitioner, Hariya Rabari be enlarged on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- cash to the notification of Addl. Sessions Judge Bali for the appearance in that court on the next date of hearing and as end when called upon to do so.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial