Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Moola Ram Vs. Laxmi

Moola Ram vs Laxmi

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 06, 1990
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/754900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
D.B. Crl. Appeal No. 82 of 1990
Subject
Criminal;Family
Disposition
Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Section 125--Maintenance allowance--Allegation of illtreatment against brother-in-law and sister-in-law--Husband not prepared to live separate from mother and sister--Held, wife is entitled to live separately; and (ii) maintenance allowance of Rs. 250/- to wife and Rs. 150/- to daughter is ...

Key legal issue
Criminal;Family
Outcome / disposition
Appeal dismissed
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Moola Ram

Advocate B. Advani, Adv.

Respondent

Laxmi

Advocate Nemo

Legal References

Reported In
II(1991)DMC458; 1990(1)WLN577

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - section 125--maintenance allowance--allegation of illtreatment against brother-in-law and sister-in-law--husband not prepared to live separate from mother and sister--held, wife is entitled to live separately; and (ii) maintenance allowance of rs. 250/- to wife and rs. 150/- to daughter is not excessive as husband's income is rs. 1000/- p.m.;as the husband was not prepared to live separate from his sister and brother-in-law against whom the wife has alleged ill-treatment with her, the wife was justified in living separate from the husband...the amount of income of the husband being rs. 1000/- per month, allowed the maintenance allowed to the wife and daughter.;appeal dismissed. - a.k. mathur, j.1. heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgment dated 1.2.1990 passed by the learned judge family court, jodhpur, by which an amount of rs. 250/- per month was allowed as maintenance allowance to respondent laxmi and rs. 150/- per month to the daughther moha.2. the learned counsel for the appellant has strenuously contended that the husband was and still is ready and willing to keep the wife, but she is reluctant to live with him and as such the question of the husband treating the wife with cruelty does not arise and there cannot be justification for allowing the maintenance allowance to the wife and the daughter.3. the learned judge has discussed in detail the evidence on record and has arrived at the conclusion that as the husband was not prepared to live separate from his sister and brother-in-law against whom the wife has alleged ill-treatment with her, the wife was justified in living separate from the husband. the learned judge has also taken into consideration the fact that by the order of the court, the wife had lived with husband from 31.10.1988 to 30.8.1989, and thereafter because of ill-treatment, she was constrained to live separate. with the discussion the learned judge, taking into consideration the amount of income of the husband being rs. 1000/- per month, allowed the maintenance allowance to the wife and daughter.4. as stated earlier this in our opinion cannot be said to be excessive. the appeal has no substance and is dismissed summarily.

Full Judgment

A.K. Mathur, J.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellant and perused the Judgment dated 1.2.1990 passed by the learned Judge Family Court, Jodhpur, by which an amount of Rs. 250/- per month was allowed as maintenance allowance to respondent Laxmi and Rs. 150/- per month to the daughther Moha.

2. The learned Counsel for the appellant has strenuously contended that the husband was and still is ready and willing to keep the wife, but she is reluctant to live with him and as such the question of the husband treating the wife with cruelty does not arise and there cannot be Justification for allowing the maintenance allowance to the wife and the daughter.

3. The learned Judge has discussed in detail the evidence on record and has arrived at the conclusion that as the husband was not prepared to live separate from his sister and brother-in-law against whom the wife has alleged Ill-treatment with her, the wife was justified in living separate from the husband. The learned Judge has also taken into consideration the fact that by the order of the Court, the wife had lived with husband from 31.10.1988 to 30.8.1989, and thereafter because of ill-treatment, she was constrained to live separate. With the discussion the learned Judge, taking into consideration the amount of income of the husband being Rs. 1000/- per month, allowed the maintenance allowance to the wife and daughter.

4. As stated earlier this in our opinion cannot be said to be excessive. The appeal has no substance and is dismissed summarily.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial