Amar Singh Vs. State

Amar Singh vs State

Disposition Application partly allowed Court Rajasthan Decided Mar 09, 1965

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/753236

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/753236
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: I.N. Chhangani, J.
Decided On: Mar 09, 1965
Case Number: Criminal Misc. Case No. 36 of 1965
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Application partly allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Application partly allowed
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 94 and 95

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amar Singh

Advocate Kedar Chand Bhandari, Adv.

Respondent

State

Advocate Har Nath Calla, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 94 and 95
Reported In: AIR1965Raj160; 1965CriLJ408

Excerpt

- order in pursuance of section 95 (1), criminal p. c., i, m. s. 'sadasivan, district magistrate, udaipur, do hereby order to the superintendent of post offices, udaipur that all documents, parcels, money orders, registered letters, letters, postal orders, saving bank transactions etc. which have been received with the following addresses by him, may be handed over to the station house officer, surajpole, udaipur, in connection withthe investigation of case f. i. r. no. 51/64, under section 420, i. p. c. against shri amar singh mehta. i. a. s. mehta (amar singh mehta), secretary, board of general knowledge education, rajasthan, udaipur. 2. a. s. mehta (secretary, rajasthan hindi vidya peeth (hindi vishwa vidyalaya), udaipur. 3. secretary of the above two institutions. sd. district magistrate, udaipur.' 3. again, presumably at the instance of the superintendent of police, udaipur, the district magistrate, udaipur, passed a second order ex. 2 dated 21st september, 1964 which reads as follows : 'no. jud/7351/54 dated the 21st september, 1964.

Full Judgment

ORDER

In pursuance of Section 95 (1), Criminal P. C., I, M. S. 'Sadasivan, District Magistrate, Udaipur, do hereby order to the Superintendent of Post Offices, Udaipur that all documents, parcels, money orders, registered letters, letters, postal orders, saving bank transactions etc. which have been received with the following addresses by him, may be handed over to the Station House Officer, Surajpole, Udaipur, in connection withthe investigation of case F. I. R. No. 51/64, under Section 420, I. P. C. against Shri Amar Singh Mehta.

I. A. S. Mehta (Amar Singh Mehta), Secretary, Board of General Knowledge Education, Rajasthan, Udaipur.

2. A. S. Mehta (Secretary, Rajasthan Hindi Vidya Peeth (Hindi Vishwa Vidyalaya), Udaipur.

3. Secretary of the above two institutions.

Sd.

District Magistrate, Udaipur.'

3. Again, presumably at the instance of the Superintendent of Police, Udaipur, the District Magistrate, Udaipur, passed a second order Ex. 2 dated 21st September, 1964 which reads as follows :

'No. Jud/7351/54 Dated the 21st September, 1964.

Same Parties Amar Singh vs State Same Subject Criminal Same Judge I.N. Chhangani, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 94 and 95

Criminal