Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdu Razak Vs. State of Kerala

Abdu Razak vs State of Kerala

Disposition Appeal allowed Court Kerala Decided Jul 06, 2006
~5 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/726686

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P. (C) No. 14686 of 2006
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Appeal allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LABOUR & SERVICES Appointment: [V.K. Bali, CH, P.R. Raman & S. Siri Jagan, JJ] Post of Pharmacist in Homeopathy Subordinate Service - Special Rules for Kerala Homeopathy Subordinate Service Rules, 1999 introducing new qualifications Vacancy arising subsequent to coming into force of the said special rules Hel...

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Appeal allowed
Acts & sections
Kerala Co-operative Societies Act; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 19

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdu Razak

Advocate P.V. Surendranath and ; V.A. Abdul Jaleel, Advs.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Advocate T.R. Ramachandran Nair,; V.G. Arun,; M. Ajay, Advs.

Legal References

Acts
Kerala Co-operative Societies Act; Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 8(1); Constitution of India - Article 19
Reported In
2006(3)KLT696

Excerpt

- labour & services appointment: [v.k. bali, ch, p.r. raman & s. siri jagan, jj] post of pharmacist in homeopathy subordinate service - special rules for kerala homeopathy subordinate service rules, 1999 introducing new qualifications vacancy arising subsequent to coming into force of the said special rules held, vacancies have to be filled up only in accordance with special rules, 1999. unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications prescribed by special rules. state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without retrospective effect. mohanan k.r. & anr vs director of homeopathy, kerala homeopathy services, trivandrum & ors. - the objection is that item 3 is the copies of minutes of various meetings of the managing committee and it is not conducive for the better interest of the bank to publicise the decisions taken in various meetings of the committee and unders. - information including commercial confidence trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information......even after the direction, there was no response from the 3rd respondent. aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent, the writ petition is filed.2. the petitioner submits that as per the provisions of the right to information act, 2005 (act 22 of 2005), hereinafter referred to as 'the act', he is entitled to obtain necessary information. the petitioner also submits that the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent is a clear violation of petitioner's right under section 3 of the act and also the fundamental right guaranteed under article 19 of the constitution of india.3. in the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent it is stated that item 3 related to the copies of minutes of various meetings of the managing committee and all the policy decisions relating to the administration of the society were taken after discussion in the meetings of the committee and the society was having business rivalry with other commercial banks. it is also stated that under section 8(1)(d) of the act, there was no obligation to give any citizen information including commercial confidence, trade secrets, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party. it is further stated that item 4 related to copy of reference file in respect of enquiry ordered and it was only available with the assistant registrar, tirur. it is also stated that all details except items 3 and 4, could be issued on a proper application with prescribed fee.4. question to be decided in this writ petition is that, as per the provisions of the act, the petitioner is entitled to obtain the information relates to items 3 and 4 or not.5. by ext.p7 the petitioner requested certain documents. item no. 3 is the copies of minutes of various meetings of the managing committee held between 1-12-25 to 31-1-2006 and item no. 4 is the copy of reference file in respect of an enquiry ordered. the objection is that item 3 is the copies of minutes of various meetings of the.....

Full Judgment

K. Thankappan, J.

1. Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to respondents 3 and 4 to issue necessary information to the petitioner as prayed for inExts.P1 and P7 applications. The petitioner is an A class member of the 5th respondent Service Cooperative Bank, which is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act. He submitted an application before the 3rd respondent Society for obtaining certain information by way of copies of documents. Since there was no positive response from the 3rd respondent, the petitioner submitted similar application before the 4th respondent. Thereafter, the petitioner was informed that the required copies of the documents will not be furnished without the consent of the department. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation before the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies and the Assistant Registrar directed the 3rd respondent to take steps to issue copies of the documents to the petitioner. According to the petitioner, even after the direction, there was no response from the 3rd respondent. Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent, the Writ Petition is filed.

2. The petitioner submits that as per the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (Act 22 of 2005), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', he is entitled to obtain necessary information. The petitioner also submits that the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent is a clear violation of petitioner's right under Section 3 of the Act and also the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

3. In the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent it is stated that item 3 related to the copies of minutes of various meetings of the Managing Committee and all the policy decisions relating to the administration of the Society were taken after discussion in the meetings of the committee and the Society was having business rivalry with other commercial banks. It is also stated that under Section 8(1)(d) of the Act, there was no obligation to give any citizen information including commercial confidence, trade secrets, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party. It is further stated that item 4 related to copy of reference file in respect of enquiry ordered and it was only available with the Assistant Registrar, Tirur. It is also stated that all details except items 3 and 4, could be issued on a proper application with prescribed fee.

4. Question to be decided in this Writ Petition is that, as per the provisions of the Act, the petitioner is entitled to obtain the information relates to items 3 and 4 or not.

5. By Ext.P7 the petitioner requested certain documents. Item No. 3 is the copies of minutes of various meetings of the Managing Committee held between 1-12-25 to 31-1-2006 and item No. 4 is the copy of reference file in respect of an enquiry ordered. The objection is that item 3 is the copies of minutes of various meetings of the Managing Committee and it is not conducive for the better interest of the bank to publicise the decisions taken in various meetings of the committee and underS.8(1)(d) of the Act there is no obligation to give any citizen information including commercial confidence, trade secrets, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party and, therefore, the details cannot be issued as required for.

6. In order to ensure greater and more effective access to information, the Act was introduced for providing an effective frame work for effectuating the right of information recognized under Article 19 of the Constitution of India. The provisions ensure maximum disclosure and minimum exemptions, consistent with the constitutional provisions, and effective mechanism for access to information and disclosure by authorities. Democracy requires informed citizens and transparency of information. The Act provides for setting out Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority. Section 8 of the Act deals with exemption from disclosure of information. Section8(1)(d) of the Act reads as follows:-

information including commercial confidence trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information.

Section 2(f) defines the term 'information' which reads as 'Information' means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force.' The information sought for under item No. 3 concerns the minutes of the Managing Committee meetings and it is not pertaining to the commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to obtain the information under item No. 3.

7. Item No. 4 is the copy of reference file in respect of an enquiry ordered by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tirur. As per the counter affidavit filed by the 4th respondent, item No. 4 is available with the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Tirur. For obtaining information under item No. 4, the petitioner has to make a request to the Assistant Registrar, Tirur.

8. In the above circumstances, the Writ Petition is allowed directing the 5th respondent bank to issue the information as prayed inExts.P1 and P7, except item No. 4, to the petitioner on payment of the prescribed fee, as early as possible at any rate within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is allowed as above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial