Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Company

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 06, 1957
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/718650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Company M.P. No. 9 of 1956
Subject
Company

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Company
Acts & sections
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 3

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Company

Advocate P. Govindan Nair and; P.K. Kurien, Advs.

Respondent

Advocate K.P. Abraham and; V.V. Sebastian, Advs.

Legal References

Acts
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 3
Cases Referred
Oistrict Court. See British India Corporation Ltd. v. Shanti Narain
Reported In
AIR1957Ker60

Excerpt

- ordervaradaraja iyengar, j.1. this is a petition to rectify the register of the 1st respondent company. 2. preliminary objection has been raised that this petition ought to have been filed in the district court having jurisdiction in the matter and not in the high court and reliance is placed on the notifications dated 23-5-1951 and 27-9-1951 issued by the government of india and by the t.c. state government under section 3 of the repealed companies act, 1913.. the argument is that these notifications still apply notwithstanding the repeal of the companies act, 1913, and its replacement by the act of 1956.it is not contended on the petitioner's side that the notification is any way inconsistent with the express provisions in section 10 of the act of 1956 corresponding to the repealed section 3. if so, the notifications do apply and the result is that the court of exclusive jurisdiction in the matter concerned is the oistrict court. see british india corporation ltd. v. shanti narain, air 1935 all 310 (a).3. i therefore direct the return of the company petition no. 9 of 56 herein to the petitionerfor presentation to the proper court. there will, however, be no order for costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Varadaraja Iyengar, J.

1. This is a petition to rectify the register of the 1st respondent company.

2. Preliminary objection has been raised that this petition ought to have been filed in the District Court having jurisdiction in the matter and not in the High Court and reliance Is placed on the Notifications dated 23-5-1951 and 27-9-1951 Issued by the Government of India and by the T.C. State Government under Section 3 of the repealed Companies Act, 1913.. The argument is that these notifications still apply notwithstanding the repeal of the Companies Act, 1913, and its replacement by the Act of 1956.

It is not contended on the petitioner's side that the notification is any way inconsistent with the express provisions in Section 10 of the Act of 1956 corresponding to the repealed Section 3. If so, the Notifications do apply and the result is that the Court of exclusive jurisdiction in the matter concerned is the Oistrict Court. See British India Corporation Ltd. v. Shanti Narain, AIR 1935 All 310 (A).

3. I therefore direct the return of the Company petition No. 9 of 56 herein to the petitionerfor presentation to the proper Court. There will, however, be no order for costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial