Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

C. Krishnakumar and anr. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

C. Krishnakumar and anr. vs State of Kerala and ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Kerala Decided Jan 08, 2008
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/717179

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA No. 2 of 2008
Subject
Constitution
Disposition
Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Constitution
Outcome / disposition
Petition dismissed
Acts & sections
Kerala (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) issue of Community Certificate Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 11, 11(4) and 12(3); Principal Act - Sections 12

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

C. Krishnakumar and anr.

Advocate N. Nandakumara Menon, Sr. Adv.,; P.K. Manojkumar and; Su

Respondent

State of Kerala and ors.

Advocate P.K. Santamma, Adv. and; P. Santhosh Kumar, GP

Legal References

Acts
Kerala (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) issue of Community Certificate Act, 1996 - Sections 7, 11, 11(4) and 12(3); Principal Act - Sections 12
Reported In
2008(1)KLJ406; 2008(1)KLT580

Excerpt

- j.b. koshy, j.1. petitioner is challenging the order dated 24-12-2007 cancelling the community certificate passed by the 2nd respondent under section 11 of the kerala (scheduled castes and scheduled tribes) issue of community certificate act, 1996 (in short' the act'). such orders were appealable under section 12(3) of the act. but by ordinance no. 55/2007, section 11 was amended by inserting sub rule 4 to section 11 providing that no appeal or suit will lie against such orders passed by the scrutiny committee. section 12(3) was also omitted. section 7 ordinance reads as follows:7. amendment of section 11: in section 11 of the principal act:-(i) omitted(ii) after sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namaly:(4) an order passed by the scrutiny committee shall be final and conclusive. no suit or appeal shall lie against the order passed by the scrutiny committee.section 8 of the ordinance reads as follows:8. amendment of section 12: in section 12 of the principal act, sub-section (3) shall be omitted.2. therefore, the only remedy for the petitioner is to file a writ petition if there are grounds for filing the same. without prejudice to the right of the petitioner, this appeal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

J.B. Koshy, J.

1. Petitioner is challenging the order dated 24-12-2007 cancelling the community certificate passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 11 of the Kerala (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) issue of Community Certificate Act, 1996 (in short' the Act'). Such orders were appealable under Section 12(3) of the Act. But by Ordinance No. 55/2007, Section 11 was amended by inserting Sub rule 4 to Section 11 providing that no appeal or suit will lie against such orders passed by the Scrutiny Committee. Section 12(3) was also omitted. Section 7 Ordinance reads as follows:

7. Amendment of Section 11: In Section 11 of the principal Act:

-(i) omitted

(ii) after Sub-section (3), the following sub-section shall be inserted, namaly:

(4) An order passed by the Scrutiny Committee shall be final and conclusive. No suit or appeal shall lie against the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee.

Section 8 of the ordinance reads as follows:8. Amendment of Section 12: In Section 12 of the principal Act, Sub-section (3) shall be omitted.

2. Therefore, the only remedy for the petitioner is to file a writ petition if there are grounds for filing the same. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner, this appeal is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial