Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cwt Vs. C.K. Gupta

Cwt vs C.K. Gupta

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 24, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/710735

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Case Number
WT Case Nos. 45-49 of 1991 24 July 2002
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

In the Delhi High Court D.K. Jain & Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ. - - Jolly, the learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, submits that despite his best efforts he has not been able to get any instructions in this behalf.

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cwt

Advocate R.D. Jolly and; Ajay Jha,;for the Revenue; C.S. Aggarwal

Respondent

C.K. Gupta

Legal References

Reported In
[2003]127TAXMAN553(Delhi)

Excerpt

in the delhi high court d.k. jain & sanjay kishan kaul, jj. - - jolly, the learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, submits that despite his best efforts he has not been able to get any instructions in this behalf.orderthese applications under section 27(3) of the wealth tax act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act) were filed in the year 1991 and since then the matters are being adjourned to ascertain the final status of the order passed by the tribunal in the case, of c.k. gupta (huf), the respondent herein, on 29-8-1997 in it appeal no. 362 (delhi) of 1993, pertaining to the assessment year 1968-69. mr. r.d. jolly, the learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, submits that despite his best efforts he has not been able to get any instructions in this behalf. he submits that as per his instructions the records of the case are not traceable in the department. mr. c.s. aggarwal, the learned counsel for the assessed, on the other hand, submits that according to his instructions the said order has attained finality as the revenue had not filed any reference against the said order.2. we feel that in view of the statement made by mr. aggarwal, there is no point in adjourning the matter again for awaiting the aforementioned information. the order of the tribunal, relied upon by the tribunal, in the present case, having attained finality, there is no ground for issuing a direction to the tribunal to refer a question of law.3. the applications are, accordingly, dismissed. no costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

These applications under section 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were filed in the year 1991 and since then the matters are being adjourned to ascertain the final status of the order passed by the Tribunal in the case, of C.K. Gupta (HUF), the respondent herein, on 29-8-1997 in IT Appeal No. 362 (Delhi) of 1993, pertaining to the assessment year 1968-69. Mr. R.D. Jolly, the learned senior standing counsel for the revenue, submits that despite his best efforts he has not been able to get any instructions in this behalf. He submits that as per his instructions the records of the case are not traceable in the department. Mr. C.S. Aggarwal, the learned counsel for the assessed, on the other hand, submits that according to his instructions the said order has attained finality as the revenue had not filed any reference against the said order.

2. We feel that in view of the statement made by Mr. Aggarwal, there is no point in adjourning the matter again for awaiting the aforementioned information. The order of the Tribunal, relied upon by the Tribunal, in the present case, having attained finality, there is no ground for issuing a direction to the Tribunal to refer a question of law.

3. The applications are, accordingly, dismissed. No costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial