Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cit Vs. Inchcape India (P) Ltd.

Cit vs inchcape India (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 20, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/710693

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Case Number
IT Appeal No. 46 of 2002 20 August 2002
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

In the Delhi High Court D.K. Jain & Sharda Aggarwal, JJ. -

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cit

Advocate R.D. Jolly,;for the Revenue; P.V. Kapur and; Ms. Anuradha D

Respondent

inchcape India (P) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
[2002]124TAXMAN744(Delhi)

Excerpt

in the delhi high court d.k. jain & sharda aggarwal, jj. - orderthis appeal under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') is directed against the order, dated 28-5-2001, passed by the tribunal, delhi bench 'a', delhi in it appeal no. 4015 (delhi) of 1999, pertaining to the assessment year 1996-97.2. by the impugned order the tribunal has deleted the interest levied under section 234b of the act, on the ground that before levying the said interest, there was no application of mind on the part of the assessing officer, inasmuch as, while completing assessment he had not made any order for charging the interest. while holding so, the tribunal has relied on the judgments of the patna high court in ranchi club ltd. v. cit : [1996]217itr72(patna) and uday mistanna bhandar & complex v. cit : [1996]222itr44(patna) , wherein it was held that notice of demand claiming interest can be issued only when there is order in the assessment order levying interest.3. in view of the fact that both the said decisions have since been affirmed by the supreme court in cit v. ranchi club ltd. : [2001]247itr209(sc) no substantial question of law survives for our consideration. admittedly in the present case, there was no order for charging of interest under section 234b of the act in the assessment order.4. it may also be noted that a full bench of the patna high court in smt. tej kumari v. cit (2001) 247 itr 210 , relying on decisions of the apex court in ranchi club ltd.'s case (supra), has reiterated the aforesaid view expressed in uday mistanna bhandar & complex's case (supra). it has been held that in the absence of any specific order of the assessing authority, interest could not be charged and recovered from the assessed.5. the appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against the order, dated 28-5-2001, passed by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'A', Delhi in IT Appeal No. 4015 (Delhi) of 1999, pertaining to the assessment year 1996-97.

2. By the impugned order the Tribunal has deleted the interest levied under section 234B of the Act, on the ground that before levying the said interest, there was no application of mind on the part of the assessing officer, inasmuch as, while completing assessment he had not made any order for charging the interest. While holding so, the Tribunal has relied on the judgments of the Patna High Court in Ranchi Club Ltd. v. CIT : [1996]217ITR72(Patna) and Uday Mistanna Bhandar & Complex v. CIT : [1996]222ITR44(Patna) , wherein it was held that notice of demand claiming interest can be issued only when there is order in the assessment order levying interest.

3. In view of the fact that both the said decisions have since been affirmed by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd. : [2001]247ITR209(SC) no substantial question of law survives for our consideration. Admittedly in the present case, there was no order for charging of interest under section 234B of the Act in the assessment order.

4. It may also be noted that a Full Bench of the Patna High Court in Smt. Tej Kumari v. CIT (2001) 247 ITR 210 , relying on decisions of the Apex Court in Ranchi Club Ltd.'s case (supra), has reiterated the aforesaid view expressed in Uday Mistanna Bhandar & Complex's case (supra). It has been held that in the absence of any specific order of the assessing authority, interest could not be charged and recovered from the assessed.

5. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial