Cit Vs. Parmod Kumar Dang

Cit vs Parmod Kumar Dang

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 30, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/710349

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/710349
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 30, 2001
Case Number: IT Appeal No. 62 of 2001 30 July 2001
Subject: Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

In the Delhi High Court Arijit Pasayat, C.J. & D.K. Jain, J. -

Key legal issue: Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cit

Advocate R.C. Pandey and; Ms. Prem Lata Bansal,;for the Revenu; C.S.

Respondent

Parmod Kumar Dang

Legal References

Reported In: [2002]121TAXMAN40(Delhi)

Excerpt

in the delhi high court arijit pasayat, c.j. & d.k. jain, j. - orderadmit.2. the following question of law shall be adjudicated upon :'whether the tribunal was correct in its view that requirements of section 249(4)(a) of the income tax act, 1961 were complied with ?' 3. the appellant shall file within three months ten copies of the cyclostyled paper books, containing all documents on which reliance was placed before the tribunal, including any order/orders, either in the case of assessed itself or in case of any other assessed, which has been followed by the tribunal.4. the appeal be listed for hearing in the regular course.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Admit.

2. The following question of law shall be adjudicated upon :

'Whether the Tribunal was correct in its view that requirements of section 249(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were complied with ?'

3. The appellant shall file within three months ten copies of the cyclostyled paper books, containing all documents on which reliance was placed before the Tribunal, including any order/orders, either in the case of assessed itself or in case of any other assessed, which has been followed by the Tribunal.

4. The appeal be listed for hearing in the regular course.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2001 Same Parties Cit vs Parmod Kumar Dang Same Subject Direct Taxation

Direct Taxation