Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cit Vs. Associated Techno Plastics (P) Ltd.

Cit vs Associated Techno Plastics (P) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 27, 2001
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/710313

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Case Number
IT Appeal No. 20 of 2000 27 August 2001
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

In the Delhi High Court Arijit Pasayat, CJ. & D.K. Jain, J. -

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cit

Advocate R. C. Pandey and; Ms. Prem Lata Bansal,;for the Revenu; C.

Respondent

Associated Techno Plastics (P) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
[2002]120TAXMAN788(Delhi)

Excerpt

in the delhi high court arijit pasayat, cj. & d.k. jain, j. - orderheard the learned counsels for the parties.2. admit.3. the following question of law shall be adjudicated upon:'whether the tribunal was justified in holding that section 69b of the income tax act, 1961 has no application to the facts of the case?'4. the appellant shall file within three months ten copies of the cyclostyled paper books, containing all documents on which reliance was placed before the tribunal, including any order/orders, either in the case of the assessed itself or in case of any other assessed, which has been followed by the tribunal.5. the appeal be listed for hearing in the regular course.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. Admit.

3. The following question of law shall be adjudicated upon:

'Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that section 69B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has no application to the facts of the case?'

4. The appellant shall file within three months ten copies of the cyclostyled paper books, containing all documents on which reliance was placed before the Tribunal, including any order/orders, either in the case of the assessed itself or in case of any other assessed, which has been followed by the Tribunal.

5. The appeal be listed for hearing in the regular course.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial