Vinod Kumar Vs. State

Vinod Kumar vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 14, 2002

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/708085

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/708085
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Mahmood Ali Khan, J.
Decided On: Aug 14, 2002
Case Number: Crl. M.M. No. 2241 of 2002
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case discussed the feasibility of grant of bail to the petitioner on account of allegation of stab injuries with knife-The doctor did not give any opinion as to the nature of injuries-There was a registration of cross case and there was likelihood of case taking a long time- The petitioner was admitted to bail o...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 324; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod Kumar

Advocate Javed Alvi, Adv

Respondent

State

Advocate Richa Kapur, A.P.P.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 324; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27
Reported In: 100(2002)DLT186

Excerpt

the case discussed the feasibility of grant of bail to the petitioner on account of allegation of stab injuries with knife-the doctor did not give any opinion as to the nature of injuries-there was a registration of cross case and there was likelihood of case taking a long time- the petitioner was admitted to bail on furnishing bond in sum of rs. 10, 000/- - - 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.ordermahmood ali khan, j.1. two cross cases have been registered in respect of the same incident. the case fir no. 709/02 is registered on the complaint of the petitioner under section 324, ipc read with section 34, ipc and section 27 of the arms act. in the instant case the allegation is that the petitioner has given stab injuries with knife and stabbed on the stomach of the complainant which caused injuries 2.5 x 1.5 cm., on the lower chest 2.5 x 2 cm., on the skull 8 cm. x 2.5 cm. and 6 x 0.5 cm. apart from another stab wound on (sic.) muscle 5 x 1.5 cm. and 5 x 1.5 cm. and the injured was discharged on the next date. app has stated that the doctor has not yet given the opinion about the nature of the injury whether it was grievous or simple although two months have passed. the injured was discharged on the following day.2. keeping in view the allegations made that the assailant party was armed with knife and a sword and a cross case has been registered and the case is also likely to take a long time, i admit the petitioner to bail. he shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.petition stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Mahmood Ali Khan, J.

1. Two cross cases have been registered in respect of the same incident. The case FIR No. 709/02 is registered on the complaint of the petitioner under Section 324, IPC read with Section 34, IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. In the instant case the allegation is that the petitioner has given stab injuries with knife and stabbed on the stomach of the complainant which caused injuries 2.5 x 1.5 cm., on the lower chest 2.5 x 2 cm., on the skull 8 cm. x 2.5 cm. and 6 x 0.5 cm. apart from another stab wound on (sic.) muscle 5 x 1.5 cm. and 5 x 1.5 cm. and the injured was discharged on the next date. APP has stated that the doctor has not yet given the opinion about the nature of the injury whether it was grievous or simple although two months have passed. The injured was discharged on the following day.

2. Keeping in view the allegations made that the assailant party was armed with knife and a sword and a cross case has been registered and the case is also likely to take a long time, I admit the petitioner to bail. He shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court on further condition that he shall not try to contact the prosecution witnesses and tamper with evidence.

Petition stands disposed of.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2002 Same Parties Vinod Kumar vs State Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Mahmood Ali Khan, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 324; Arms Act...

Criminal