Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cit Vs. Shri Chand

Cit vs Shri Chand

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 06, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/707805

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Case Number
IT Reference Nos. 63 of 1984 & 118 & 248 of 1985 6 May 2004
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Head Note: INCOME TAX Capital gains--CHARGEABILITYGains arising from transfer of agricultural lands in village Nangal Devat, DelhiHeld: The capital gains arising on transfer of agricultural lands belonging to assesseds in the village Nangal Devat, Delhi were chargeable to tax. Income Tax Act, 1961 s.45 Income Tax A...

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cit

Advocate R.C. Pandey and; Ajay Jha, for the Revenue;M.S. Syali; Sati

Respondent

Shri Chand

Legal References

Reported In
[2004]141TAXMAN57(Delhi)

Excerpt

head note: income tax capital gains--chargeabilitygains arising from transfer of agricultural lands in village nangal devat, delhiheld: the capital gains arising on transfer of agricultural lands belonging to assesseds in the village nangal devat, delhi were chargeable to tax. income tax act, 1961 s.45 income tax act, 1961 s.2(14) in the delhi high court b.c. patel, c.j. & badar durrez ahemed, j. - b.c. patel, c.j.in these three references, an identical question has been referred by the income tax appellate tribunal for the opinion of this court. the question reads as under :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was justified in law in holding that no capital gain was assessable on the ground that the agricultural land in village nangal dewat belonging to the assessed did not fall within the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the income tax act, 19612. it may be noted that the tribunal considered the decision in the case of surjan singh of nangal dewat and rendered the decision. against the decision of the tribunal, the revenue approached this court and the case in cit v. surjan singh (2003) 260 itr 351 . the question raised in the aforesaid appeal reads as under :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, capital gains arising on transfer of agricultural lands in village nangal dewat, delhi, is chargeable to tax ?'3. the court answered the question in the affirmative, that is, in favor of the revenue and against the assessed which no order as to costs. since the question is the same, lands are of the same village, in view of the aforesaid decision we decide the question in favor of the revenue and against the assessed with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

B.C. Patel, C.J.

In these three references, an identical question has been referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the opinion of this court. The question reads as under :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that no capital gain was assessable on the ground that the agricultural land in village Nangal Dewat belonging to the assessed did not fall within the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

2. It may be noted that the Tribunal considered the decision in the case of Surjan Singh of Nangal Dewat and rendered the decision. Against the decision of the Tribunal, the revenue approached this court and the case in CIT v. Surjan Singh (2003) 260 ITR 351 . The question raised in the aforesaid appeal reads as under :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, capital gains arising on transfer of agricultural lands in village Nangal Dewat, Delhi, is chargeable to tax ?'

3. The court answered the question in the affirmative, that is, in favor of the revenue and against the assessed which no order as to costs. Since the question is the same, lands are of the same village, in view of the aforesaid decision we decide the question in favor of the revenue and against the assessed with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial