Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cit Vs. Jhalanti and Co.

Cit vs Jhalanti and Co.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 22, 2004
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/707634

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Case Number
ITA No. 398 of 1983 <font face="Wingdings">q</font>22 July 2004
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Head Note: INCOME TAX Appeal CIT(A)--APPEALABLE -

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cit

Advocate Ms. Prem Lata Bansal and; Mr. Rajiv Awasthi and; Ms. Rashmi

Respondent

Jhalanti and Co.

Legal References

Reported In
[2005]142TAXMAN78(Delhi)

Excerpt

head note: income tax appeal cit(a)--appealable - orderlevy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215held: order levying interest under sections 139(8) and 215 is not appealable order under section 246(c). income tax act, 1961 s.246income tax act, 1961 s.139(8)income tax act, 1961 s.215in the delhi high court q mr. b.c. patel, c. j. & mr. badar durrez ahmed. j.at the instance of the revenue, the income tax appellate tribunal has referred the following two questions :1. whether an appeal lies against an order of charging of interest under section 215 of the act?2. whether the tribunal is empowered in law to invoke rule 40(5) for deleting the levy of interest under section 215?2. both the questions have to be answered in negative in view of the decision, of the supreme court in the case of central provinces manganese ore co. ltd. v. cit : [1986]160itr961(sc) wherein the question raised was :'whether orders levying interest under sub-section (8) of section 139 and under section 215 are appealable under section 246 of the income tax act.?'the court held that the question whether a case is made out for waiver or reduction of the interest levied under section 139(8) or under section 215 cannot be the subject of an appeal under clause (c) of section 246 of the income tax act.'the court further pointed out :'that is a matter which can more appropriately be dealt with by the commissioner in the exercise of his revisional jurisdiction.'3. if the appeal itself is not maintainable, there is no question of tribunal invoking rule 40(5) of the rules under section 215 of the income tax act.4. the reference is answered, accordingly with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215Held: Order levying interest under sections 139(8) and 215 is not appealable order under section 246(c).

Income Tax Act, 1961 s.246

Income Tax Act, 1961 s.139(8)

Income Tax Act, 1961 s.215

In the Delhi High Court q Mr. B.C. Patel, C. J. & Mr. Badar Durrez Ahmed. J.

At the instance of the revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following two questions :

1. Whether an appeal lies against an order of charging of interest under section 215 of the Act?

2. Whether the Tribunal is empowered in law to invoke rule 40(5) for deleting the levy of interest under section 215?

2. Both the questions have to be answered in negative in view of the decision, of the Supreme Court in the case of Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd. v. CIT : [1986]160ITR961(SC) wherein the question raised was :

'Whether orders levying interest under sub-section (8) of section 139 and under section 215 are appealable under section 246 of the Income Tax Act.?'

The court held that the question whether a case is made out for waiver or reduction of the interest levied under section 139(8) or under section 215 cannot be the subject of an appeal under clause (c) of section 246 of the Income Tax Act.'

The court further pointed out :

'That is a matter which can more appropriately be dealt with by the Commissioner in the exercise of his revisional jurisdiction.'

3. If the appeal itself is not maintainable, there is no question of Tribunal invoking rule 40(5) of the Rules under section 215 of the Income Tax Act.

4. The reference is answered, accordingly with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial