Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sushil Kumar Vs. State

Sushil Kumar vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 15, 1997
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/706017

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl. Misc. (M) No. 2677 of 1997
Subject
Criminal;Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual leave Sustained injury which contributed to invalidation for military service Claim for disability pension ...

Key legal issue
Criminal;Family
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushil Kumar

Advocate Rajesh K. Sharma, Adv

Respondent

State

Advocate Raman Sahney, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A
Reported In
I(1998)DMC70

Excerpt

.....when and where the incident transpired. this is so because it is the causal connection which alone is relevant. fourthly, since travel to and fro the place of posting may not appear to everyone as an incident of military service, a specific provision has been incorporated in the pension regulations to bring such travel within the entitlement for disability pension if an injury is sustained in this duration. fifthly, it cannot be said that each and every injury sustained while availing of casual leave would entitle the victim to claim disability pension. sixthly, provisions treating casual leave as on duty would be relevant for deciding questions pertaining to pay or to the right of the authorities to curtail or cancel the leave. lastly, injury or death resulting from an activity not connected with military service would not justify and sustain a claim for disability pension. this is so regardless f whether the injury or death has occurred at the place of posting or during working hours. this is because attributability to military service is a factor which is required to be established. - 20,000/- with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer.manmohan sarin, j.1. learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that no allegations have been made by the father end brother of the deceased although some allegations of demanding 'dowry' and 'ill-treatment' have been made against the petitioner by the mother of deceased. there is an infant girl of seven months old who is to be looked after also. learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention to diary nothings left by the deceased.2. having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, this is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. in the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on bail of furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.20,000/- with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer.the petitioner shall join and co-operate with the investigation and will not leave nct of delhi without the leave of the trial court.

Full Judgment

Manmohan Sarin, J.

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has stated that no allegations have been made by the father end brother of the deceased although some allegations of demanding 'Dowry' and 'Ill-treatment' have been made against the petitioner by the mother of deceased. There is an infant girl of seven months old who is to be looked after also. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has also drawn attention to diary nothings left by the deceased.

2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, this is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. In the event of arrest, petitioner shall be released on bail of furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with a surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Arresting Officer.

The petitioner shall join and co-operate with the investigation and will not leave NCT of Delhi without the leave of the Trial Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial