Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.C. Aggarwal Vs. State

K.C. Aggarwal vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 15, 1995
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/703185

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Probate Case No. 26 of 1992
Subject
Family;Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - (5) From the material on record, I am satisfied that petitioner is entitled to the grant of probate of Will Ex.

Key legal issue
Family;Property
Acts & sections
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.C. Aggarwal

Advocate K.K. Khaitan and; S.S. Jain, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Acts
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 276
Reported In
60(1995)DLT446

Excerpt

- - (5) from the material on record, i am satisfied that petitioner is entitled to the grant of probate of will ex.devinder gupta, j.(1) this is a petition under section 276 of the indian succession act for grant of probate of will dated 18th june, 1991 of smt. chhaya aggarwal, petitioner's wife. (2) notice was directed to be issued to the relations and beneficiaries, whose particulars are mentioned in para-5 of the petition. citation was also published in 'the statesman'. chief revenue controlling authority was also notified of the petition. in pursuance to the citation and notice objections have not been preferred. as per report of the chief revenue controlling authority, property was located within the jurisdiction of district collector, kanpur. report-was sought from the district collector, kanpur, who reported the estimated value of the immovable property of the deceased, referred to in annexure-a, namely. house no. a-6, sarvodaya nagar, kanpur, u.p. at rs. 80,00,000.00 , including the value of the land on which the house stands. the deceased had i /4th share in the property. accordingly, the approximate value, as per report of the district collector, kanpur would be rs. 20^00,000.00 of the share of deceased. (3) the petitioner has adduced evidence on affidavits. in addition to his own affidavit, two affidavits of the attesting witnesses, namely, shri k.c. bhalla and dr. o.p. arora have been placed on record. (4) from the material on record and from the depositions made in the affidavits, it stands established that smt. chhaya aggarwal expired on 21st august,1991.shewasresidingatc-19,greenpark,new delhi.on l8th june, 1991 will ex. p.i was duly executed by her in presence of the aforementioned attesting witnesses bequeathing her movable and immovable properties in favor of her daughter-in-law smt. meenakshi aggarwal (wife of shri kamal aggarwal son of the deceased), petitioner shri k.c. aggarwal (husband of the deceased) and rajat aggarwaksonofthedeceased),asperdetailsgiveninthewill.shri k.c. aggarwal is the named executor of the will for giving effect to the,will. both the.....

Full Judgment

Devinder Gupta, J.

(1) This is a petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate of will dated 18th June, 1991 of Smt. Chhaya Aggarwal, petitioner's wife.

(2) Notice was directed to be issued to the relations and beneficiaries, whose particulars are mentioned in para-5 of the petition. Citation was also published in 'The Statesman'. Chief Revenue Controlling Authority Was also notified of the petition. In pursuance to the citation and notice objections have not been preferred. As per report of the Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, property was located within the jurisdiction of District Collector, Kanpur. Report-was sought from the District Collector, Kanpur, who reported the estimated value of the immovable property of the deceased, referred to in Annexure-A, namely. House No. A-6, Sarvodaya Nagar, Kanpur, U.P. at Rs. 80,00,000.00 , including the value of the land on which the house stands. The deceased had I /4th share in the property. Accordingly, the approximate value, as per report of the District Collector, Kanpur would be Rs. 20^00,000.00 of the share of deceased.

(3) The petitioner has adduced evidence on affidavits. In addition to his own affidavit, two affidavits of the attesting witnesses, namely, Shri K.C. Bhalla and Dr. O.P. Arora have been placed on record.

(4) From the material on record and from the depositions made in the affidavits, it stands established that Smt. Chhaya Aggarwal expired on 21st August,1991.ShewasresidingatC-19,GreenPark,New Delhi.On l8th June, 1991 will Ex. P.I was duly executed by her in presence of the aforementioned attesting witnesses bequeathing her movable and immovable properties in favor of her daughter-in-law Smt. Meenakshi Aggarwal (wife of Shri Kamal Aggarwal son of the deceased), petitioner Shri K.C. Aggarwal (husband of the deceased) and Rajat AggarwaKsonofthedeceased),asperdetailsgivenintheWill.Shri K.C. Aggarwal is the named Executor of the Will for giving effect to the,Will. Both the attesting witnesses have further testified that the deceased was in sound and disposing state of mind at the time of making of the Will. It was signed after correctly understanding the contents thereof, in their presence and they also signed the Will as attesting witnesses in presence of each other and in presence of the testatrix. It is also stated in the affidavit of the petitioner that the Will Ex.P.1 is the last testamentary deposition of the deceased as regards her movable and immovable properties. Copy of death certificate has also been placed on record.

(5) From the material on record, I am satisfied that petitioner is entitled to the grant of probate of Will Ex.P.I. The petition is allowed. Necessary probate of Will EX.P.I be issued with copy of the Will Ex.P.1 annexed thereto, in accordance with law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial