Vikas Vohra Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Vikas Vohra vs State (Delhi Administration)

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 08, 1997

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/699194

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/699194
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Jaspal Singh, J.
Decided On: Sep 08, 1997
Case Number: Criminal Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2375 of 1997
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code 1973 - Section 438--Anticipatory Bail-Offence Under Section 363, 366A and 343 IPC--Kidnapping--Procuration of minor civil--Rape--Wrongful confinement--Booked--Sought anticipatory--Statement of prosecutrix that she had been moving around with him from place to place, city to city and yet witho...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vikas Vohra

Advocate S.K. Grover and; M.S. Butalia, Advs

Respondent

State (Delhi Administration)

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363
Reported In: 1997VIAD(Delhi)108; 1998(1)Crimes774; 68(1997)DLT649; 1997(43)DRJ315

Excerpt

criminal procedure code 1973 - section 438--anticipatory bail-offence under section 363, 366a and 343 ipc--kidnapping--procuration of minor civil--rape--wrongful confinement--booked--sought anticipatory--statement of prosecutrix that she had been moving around with him from place to place, city to city and yet without making any effort to escape--photographs shows both of them in a state of bliss and happiness--bail granted--petition allowed. - - 10,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting.jaspal singh, j.(1) the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in a case under sections 363, 366a, 376 and 343, indian penal code. the petitioner has placed on the record certain photographs of the petitioner with the prosecutrix. the investigating officer who is present in court admits that these are the photographs of the petitioner with the prosecutrix. even a cursory look at the photographs would show both of them in a state of bliss and happiness. it also appears from the statement of the prosecutrix that she had been moving around with him from place to place, city to city and yet without making any effort to escape. i feel the petitioner deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. in the circumstances which have been noticed above the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. in the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 10,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting. officer/investigating officer. the petitioner shall be joining investigation as and when required. (2) at this stage, as per request of the learned counsel for the state petitioner shall report before the investigating officer on 9th and 10th of september, 1997 at the police station at 4 p.m. for joining investigation. i am passing this order with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner who assures me that the petitioner would be present at the police station. dusty also.

Full Judgment

Jaspal Singh, J.

(1) The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 363, 366A, 376 and 343, Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has placed on the record certain photographs of the petitioner with the prosecutrix. The Investigating Officer who is present in Court admits that these are the photographs of the petitioner with the prosecutrix. Even a cursory look at the photographs would show both of them in a state of bliss and happiness. It also appears from the statement of the prosecutrix that she had been moving around with him from place to place, city to city and yet without making any effort to escape. I feel the petitioner deserves to be granted anticipatory bail. In the circumstances which have been noticed above the petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. In the event of his arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting. Officer/Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall be joining investigation as and when required.

(2) At this stage, as per request of the learned Counsel for the State petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer on 9th and 10th of September, 1997 at the Police Station at 4 p.m. for joining investigation. I am passing this order with the consent of the learned Counsel for the petitioner who assures me that the petitioner would be present at the Police Station. dusty also.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 1997 Same Parties Vikas Vohra vs State (Delhi Administration) Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Jaspal Singh, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438; Indi...

Criminal