Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Navneet Singh Vs. State

Navneet Singh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 20, 1997
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/698321

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) Appeal No. 345 of 1997
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case dealt with the request to grant bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, in a matter involving an accused of young age - It was found that the deceased was stabbed by a dagger that resulted in his death - The said accused was found to have hit the deceased with fits and kicks - The accus...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Navneet Singh

Advocate O.P. Wadhwa and; Akshay Singh, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
1997IVAD(Delhi)447; 66(1997)DLT448

Excerpt

the case dealt with the request to grant bail under section 439 of the criminal procedure code, 1973, in a matter involving an accused of young age - it was found that the deceased was stabbed by a dagger that resulted in his death - the said accused was found to have hit the deceased with fits and kicks - the accused had already spent about six month in custody - thereforee, it was ruled that the said accused would be granted bail - - 25,000.00 with a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.mohd. shamim, j.(1) this is an application by the petitioner for release on bail. (2) it has been urged for and on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent. he has been falsely implicated in the present case. he is a young boy of 18 years and is a student of xiith class. the only role assigned to the petitioner is that he also hit the deceased with fists and kicks. the petitioner has been in custody since september 20, 1996. thus the petitioner is entitled to an order of bail. (3) learned p.p. on the other hand, has contended that the petitioner is known to the other assailants. hence it should be presumed that there is a common intention on the part of all the assailants to kill the deceased. furthermore,one of the assailants hit the deceased with a dagger (kirpan) many a times as a result whereof the deceased succumbed to the injuries sustained at the hands of one of the assailants i.e., jaspal singh. (4) considering the above facts and circumstances, i think the present case is a fit case for bail. let the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing a surety in the sum of rs. 25,000.00 with a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Full Judgment

Mohd. Shamim, J.

(1) This is an application by the petitioner for release on bail.

(2) It has been urged for and on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is a young boy of 18 years and is a student of XIIth class. The only role assigned to the petitioner is that he also hit the deceased with fists and kicks. The petitioner has been in custody since September 20, 1996. Thus the petitioner is entitled to an order of bail.

(3) Learned P.P. on the other hand, has contended that the petitioner is known to the other assailants. Hence it should be presumed that there is a common intention on the part of all the assailants to kill the deceased. Furthermore,one of the assailants hit the deceased with a dagger (Kirpan) many a times as a result whereof the deceased succumbed to the injuries sustained at the hands of one of the assailants i.e., Jaspal Singh.

(4) Considering the above facts and circumstances, I think the present case is a fit case for bail. Let the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing a surety in the sum of Rs. 25,000.00 with a personal bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial