Ranjeet and anr. Vs. State

Ranjeet and anr. vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 21, 2004

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/697536

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/697536
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: O.P. Dwivedi, J.
Decided On: Apr 21, 2004
Case Number: Bail Application No. 429 of 2004
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 20,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 341; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjeet and anr.

Advocate Jagat Rana and; Ramesh Solanki, Advs

Respondent

State

Advocate Anil Soni, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 341; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439
Reported In: 112(2004)DLT903

Excerpt

- - 20,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court.ordero.p. dwivedi, j.1. in respect of incident dated 14/15.5.2001 an fir no. 217/2001 under sections 341/323/34, ipc was registered on the statement of injured kanhi ram. injured kanhi ram registered another fir no. 242/2001 under sections 341/323/ 34, ipc in respect of an other incident dated 21.3.2001. in both these firs deceased never named any of the petitioner as culprits. moreover, second fir was got cancelled by the police as police found it to be a false report. kanhi ram was admitted in ljpn hospital on 22.3.2001 and got discharged on 5th may, 2001. ultimately on 27.6.2001 kanhi ram died at his home. cause of death has been opined to be pneumonitis. the brother of the deceased then filed a complaint case and in support thereof he has filed affidavit and on that basis metropolitan magistrate had taken cognizance and issued processes. in response thereto respondent appeared before learned metropolitan magistrate and he was taken into custody. they are in custody since 24.11.2003.2. consideringthe fact that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner nor the name of the petitioner figured at all in these two firs allegedly registered at the instance of the deceased. i think, it is a fit case for grant of bail.3. in view of above, i, order that the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of rs. 20,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court.with these directions petition stands disposed of. dusty.

Full Judgment

ORDER

O.P. Dwivedi, J.

1. In respect of incident dated 14/15.5.2001 an FIR No. 217/2001 under Sections 341/323/34, IPC was registered on the statement of injured Kanhi Ram. Injured Kanhi Ram registered another FIR No. 242/2001 under Sections 341/323/ 34, IPC in respect of an other incident dated 21.3.2001. In both these FIRs deceased never named any of the petitioner as culprits. Moreover, second FIR was got cancelled by the police as police found it to be a false report. Kanhi Ram was admitted in LJPN Hospital on 22.3.2001 and got discharged on 5th May, 2001. Ultimately on 27.6.2001 Kanhi Ram died at his home. Cause of death has been opined to be pneumonitis. The brother of the deceased then filed a complaint case and in support thereof he has filed affidavit and on that basis Metropolitan Magistrate had taken cognizance and issued processes. In response thereto respondent appeared before learned Metropolitan Magistrate and he was taken into custody. They are in custody since 24.11.2003.

2. Consideringthe fact that no specific role has been attributed to the petitioner nor the name of the petitioner figured at all in these two FIRs allegedly registered at the instance of the deceased. I think, it is a fit case for grant of bail.

3. In view of above, I, order that the petitioner be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court.

With these directions petition stands disposed of. dusty.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2004 Same Parties Ranjeet and anr. vs State Same Subject Criminal Same Judge O.P. Dwivedi, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323 and 341; Cod...

Criminal