indu Gupta Vs. Sanjay Kumar Gupta

indu Gupta vs Sanjay Kumar Gupta

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 28, 1991

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/695949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/695949
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: P.N. Nag, J.
Decided On: Nov 28, 1991
Case Number: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 328 of 1989
Subject: Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Family
Acts & sections: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

indu Gupta

Advocate S.S. Vats and; Monoj Shama, Advs

Respondent

Sanjay Kumar Gupta

Legal References

Acts: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24
Reported In: 46(1992)DLT143; I(1992)DMC164

Excerpt

- .....name of the petitioner's wife which has been sold for rs. 2 lacs and, thereforee, according to the trial court she is not without any income. (3) from the judgment it appears that the flat in rohini was purchased in her name on the basis of the power of attorney but it does not show that it belongs to her. it is also not shown as to from where the assets have come to the wife for the purchase of the flat. it is admitted by the respondent husband that he gave rs. 20,000.00 to the respondent and the balance amount was spent by the father of the petitioner's wife. this money appears to have been returned. at any rate the wife is without any income and it is the duty of the husband to provide maintenance to her in addition to the child. the petitioner wife has asked for rs. 1,000.00 per month for herself and the child andrs.2,000.00 for litigation expenses. having regard to the fact that the respondent husband is also only drawing rs. 2 300.00 it would be expedient in the interest of justice to direct the respondent husband to pay to the petitioner wife rs. 400.00 as maintenance and rs. 300.00 as maintenance of the child already granted by the trial court i.e. rs. 700.00 in all with effect from 13-10-1988. litigation expenses shall be rs. 1.000.00 and is ordered accordingly. arrears will be paid within two months. (4) c.r. stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

P.N. Nag, J.

(1) The petitioner has filed this Revision against the order of Addl. Sessions Judge Delhi dated 18-2-1989 whereby the petitioner wife has been granted Rs. 300.00 per month for maintenance of the child with effect from the 13-8-1988 and litigation expenses fixed at Rs. 750.00 and nothing has been granted as maintenance to her.

(2) It is the admitted case of the parties that the respondent is a Junior Engineer in D.D.A. and is drawing Rs. 2,377.88. In the normal course the Court should have granted maintenance to the wife petitioner also having regard to the earning capacity of the respondent husband but what appears to have weighed in the mind of the Court that there is a house in the name of the petitioner's wife which has been sold for Rs. 2 lacs and, thereforee, according to the trial Court she is not without any income.

(3) From the judgment it appears that the flat in Rohini was purchased in her name on the basis of the power of attorney but it does not show that It belongs to her. It is also not shown as to from where the assets have come to the wife for the purchase of the flat. It is admitted by the respondent husband that he gave Rs. 20,000.00 to the respondent and the balance amount was spent by the father of the petitioner's wife. This money appears to have been returned. At any rate the wife is without any income and it is the duty of the husband to provide maintenance to her in addition to the child. The petitioner wife has asked for Rs. 1,000.00 per month for herself and the child andRs.2,000.00 for litigation expenses. Having regard to the fact that the respondent husband Is also only drawing Rs. 2 300.00 it would be expedient in the interest of justice to direct the respondent husband to pay to the petitioner wife Rs. 400.00 as maintenance and Rs. 300.00 as maintenance of the child already granted by the trial Court i.e. Rs. 700.00 in all with effect from 13-10-1988. Litigation expenses shall be Rs. 1.000.00 and is ordered accordingly. Arrears will be paid within two months.

(4) C.R. stands disposed of.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 1991 Same Parties indu Gupta vs Sanjay Kumar Gupta Same Subject Family Same Judge P.N. Nag, J. Acts & Sections Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24

Family