Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sushila Dahas Vs. State

Sushila Dahas vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 01, 1999
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/694554

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.M. (M) No. 503 of 1999
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case debated on whether the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail under Section 437(1) and 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - The petitioner was a widow and a complaint was made against her under Section 161 of the Code to implicate her - It was held that the petitioner was entitled to the benefi...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 437 and 438

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushila Dahas

Advocate Mr. K.K. Sud and; Mr. Jayant, Advs

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. Pawan Behl, A.P.P.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 437 and 438
Reported In
1999IIIAD(Delhi)632; 78(1999)DLT388

Excerpt

the case debated on whether the petitioner could be granted anticipatory bail under section 437(1) and 438 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 - the petitioner was a widow and a complaint was made against her under section 161 of the code to implicate her - it was held that the petitioner was entitled to the benefit under section 437(1) of the code and the anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner - - 10,000/- and personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the i.n.g. nandi, j.1. petitioner is a widow. statement under section 161, cr.p.c. of the complainant implicating the petitioner, has been read by mr. pawan behl, learned app. 2. in view of proviso to sub-section (1) of section 437, cr.p.c., the petitioner would be entitled to the relief under section 438, cr.p.c. 3. in the event of the arrest of the petitioner, on her furnishing a surety for the amount of rs. 10,000/- and personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the i.o./arresting officer, she is ordered to be released on bail on condition that she will join investigations as and when required by notice under section 160, cr.p.c.

Full Judgment

N.G. Nandi, J.

1. Petitioner is a widow. Statement under Section 161, Cr.P.C. of the complainant implicating the petitioner, has been read by Mr. Pawan Behl, learned APP.

2. In view of proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 437, Cr.P.C., the petitioner would be entitled to the relief under Section 438, Cr.P.C.

3. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, on her furnishing a surety for the amount of Rs. 10,000/- and personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the I.O./Arresting Officer, she is ordered to be released on bail on condition that she will join investigations as and when required by notice under Section 160, Cr.P.C.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial