Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Asadhulla Sarwari Vs. State

Asadhulla Sarwari vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 21, 1991
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/694005

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) Appeal No. 1859 of 1991
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - Section 389--Foreign over-staying sentenced to imprisonment already undergone in custody during trial and Fine--Suspension of sentence--sentence of fine cannot be suspended. ;It is a case wherein the petitioner is in a position to deposit the amount of fine and not that he cannot depo...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Asadhulla Sarwari

Advocate K.K. Luthra,; O.P. Malviya and; B.D. Batra, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
46(1992)DLT8; 1992(22)DRJ176

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 389--foreign over-staying sentenced to imprisonment already undergone in custody during trial and fine--suspension of sentence--sentence of fine cannot be suspended. ;it is a case wherein the petitioner is in a position to deposit the amount of fine and not that he cannot deposit the fine. suspension of sentence is dealt with by sub-section (3) of section 389 of the code. it says that where a convicted person being on bail is sentenced to imprisonment fdr a term not exceeding three years or where the offence with which he is convicted is bailable and he is on bail, the court shall release him on bail. unfortunately it is a case where the petitioner is not sentenced to any substantive setence which requires to be suspended or where the offence is bailable. thereforee, the suspension of sentence is not covered by section 389 of the code. normally in a case where there is a substantive sentence of imprisonment along with a sentence of fine, the plea generally is that the fine has been deposited and the sentence of imprisonment may be suspended. it is only in such a situation that the substantive sentence of imprisonment is suspended. moreover, the petitioner is a foreign national and sentenced to deportation also. in case, he comes out on bail, the order of dcporation may not be possible. taking the totality of circumstances into consiideration, it is not possible to suspend the sentence of fine. - - 5,000.00 with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court......of law or not. my attention has been drawn to section 389 of the code which deals with suspension of sentences pending the appeal. it is also admitted before me that earlier the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 5,000.00 with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. it is further admitted that later on an application was moved on behalf of the petitioner staling that he was not able to produce, a surety and, thereforee, the petitioner may be permitted to deposit the amount of the bail bond which was accordingly done. thereforee, it is a case wherein the petitioner is in a position to deposit the amount of fine and not that he cannot deposit the fine. suspension of sentence is dealt with by sub-section (3) of section 389 of the code. it says that where a convicted person being on bail is sentenced to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or where the offence with which he is convicted is bailable and he is on bail, the court shall release him on bail. unfortunately it is a case where the petitioner is not sentenced to any substantive sentence which requires to be suspended or where the offence is bailable. thereforee the suspension of sentence is not covered by section 389 of the code. normally in a case where there is a substantive sentence of imprisonment along with a sentence of fine, the plea generally is that the fine has been deposited and the sentence of imprisonment may be suspended. it is only in such a situation that the substantive sentence of imprisonment is suspended. moreover, the petitioner is a foreign national and sentenced to deportation also. i case, he comes out on bail, the order of deportation may not be possible. (4) taking the totality of circumstances into consideration, it is not possible to suspend the sentence of fine. the revision is dismissed.

Full Judgment

R.L. Gupta, J.

(1) The petitioner was convicted under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act for over staying in India in House No.B-3/156, Janak Puri, New Delhi on 11.6.90 and sentenced to imprisonment already undergone in custody during trial and also to pay a fine of Rs.5000/ - or in default suffer Si for 5 months. He appealed before the learned Asj, Delhi and also applied for suspension of the sentence,. The appellate Court was of the view that the amount of fine being not very heavy did not warrant suspension.

(2) This petition has been filed under Section 482 read with Section 439 of the, Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the aforesaid order and releasing the petitioner on bail.

(3) I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the relevant provisions. It may be noted that in this case the petitioner was sentenced to imprisonment already undergone. thereforee, in essence there is no substantive sentence of imprisonment which is required to be suspended. We are only to see whether the sentence of fine can be suspended under the relevant provisions of law or not. My attention has been drawn to Section 389 of the Code which deals with suspension of sentences pending the appeal. It is also admitted before me that earlier the petitioner was directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000.00 with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. It is further admitted that later on an application was moved on behalf of the petitioner staling that he was not able to produce, a surety and, thereforee, the petitioner may be permitted to deposit the amount of the bail bond which was accordingly done. thereforee, it is a case wherein the petitioner is in a position to deposit the amount of fine and not that he cannot deposit the fine. Suspension of sentence is dealt with by sub-Section (3) of Section 389 of the Code. It says that where a convicted person being on bail is sentenced to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or where the offence with which he is convicted is bailable and he is on bail, the Court shall release him on bail. Unfortunately it is a case where the petitioner is not sentenced to any substantive sentence which requires to be suspended or where the offence is bailable. thereforee the suspension of sentence is not covered by section 389 of the Code. Normally in a case where there is a substantive sentence of imprisonment along with a sentence of fine, the plea generally is that the fine has been deposited and the sentence of imprisonment may be suspended. It is only in such a situation that the substantive sentence of imprisonment is suspended. Moreover, the petitioner is a foreign national and sentenced to deportation also. I case, he comes out on bail, the order of deportation may not be possible.

(4) Taking the totality of circumstances into consideration, it is not possible to suspend the sentence of fine. The revision is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial