Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Saleem Vs. State

Saleem vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 26, 1992
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/693144

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) Appeal No. 133 of 1992
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case examined the validity of the bail to the accused under NDPS Act over the charge of tempering of the seal of the samples of apparent from CFSL report - The Court granted bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. - - On suspension, he was asked to open the box,from which/nine balls like '...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saleem

Advocate K.K. Sud and; S.K. Agarwal, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
50(1993)DLT604

Excerpt

the case examined the validity of the bail to the accused under ndps act over the charge of tempering of the seal of the samples of apparent from cfsl report - the court granted bail under section 439 of the criminal procedure code, 1973. - - on suspension, he was asked to open the box,from which/nine balls like 'gulabjarnun' of black colour were recovered/which/on weighing were found to be 500 gms. 20.000.00 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.usha mehra, j.(1) the case of the prosecution is that on 15-12-91at about 9.15 p.m. in the stair case of kotha no. 57, o.b. road, delhi,accused was apprehended while he was coming down the stair case. he was holding a box in his hand. on suspension, he was asked to open the box,from which/nine balls like 'gulabjarnun' of black colour were recovered/which/on weighing were found to be 500 gms., out of which one ball was taken which was of 65 gms., was sample. the same was sealed with the seal of 'r.k..' and sho bearing impression 'k.s.'. this/sample was sent to the cfsl. cfsl report has been received which indicates that 60 gms. (appx.)brownish colour solid substance was received which on test was found to be'charas'(2) counsel for the petitioner contended that report of the cfsl shows that there was a tampering of the seal. the penalty being very severe in such a case, sealing and sampling assumes importance. since between the weight which was supposed to have been recovered at the site and the one which was reported to have been delivered at the cfsl, there is a difference of 5 gms., mr. sud contends that this is a pointer towardstampering.(3) taking into consideration the facts and without touching the merits of this case i think i it is a fit case where bail should be grantedaccordingly, i admit the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of rs. 20.000.00 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Full Judgment

Usha Mehra, J.

(1) The case of the prosecution is that on 15-12-91at about 9.15 p.m. in the stair case of Kotha No. 57, O.B. Road, Delhi,accused was apprehended while he was coming down the stair case. He was holding a box in his hand. On suspension, he was asked to open the box,from which/nine balls like 'Gulabjarnun' of black colour were recovered/which/on weighing were found to be 500 gms., out of which one ball was taken which was of 65 gms., was sample. The same was sealed with the seal of 'R.K..' and Sho bearing impression 'K.S.'. This/sample was sent to the CFSL. Cfsl report has been received which indicates that 60 gms. (appx.)brownish colour solid substance was received which on test was found to be'Charas'

(2) Counsel for the petitioner contended that report of the CFSL shows that there was a tampering of the seal. The penalty being very severe in such a case, sealing and sampling assumes importance. Since between the weight which was supposed to have been recovered at the site and the one which was reported to have been delivered at the Cfsl, there is a difference of 5 gms., Mr. Sud contends that this is a pointer towardstampering.

(3) Taking into consideration the facts and without touching the merits of this case I think I it is a fit case where bail should be grantedAccordingly, I admit the petitioner on bail on his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 20.000.00 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial