Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravinder Pal Singh Vs. State

Ravinder Pal Singh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jan 19, 1993
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/691707

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) Appeal No. 2679 of 1992
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

The case discussed the effect of joint trial of offences on the sureties for the bail under Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - It was found that the accused had committed three offences within a span of one year - These offences were tried together in one trial - Hence, in this view, it was held that...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 219

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravinder Pal Singh

Advocate J. Sethi and; O.P. Faizi, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Reported In
49(1993)DLT726

Excerpt

the case discussed the effect of joint trial of offences on the sureties for the bail under section 219 of the criminal procedure code, 1973 - it was found that the accused had committed three offences within a span of one year - these offences were tried together in one trial - hence, in this view, it was held that the accused could be released on bail on one surety rather than three sureties - sat pal, j.(1) the learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to section 219 of the criminal procedure code and submits that since all the offences are alleged to have been committed within one year, the accused should be charged with and tried at one trial. he, thereforee, submits that instead of furnishing 3 sureties the accused should be directed to furnish one surety. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and i order that the accused be released on bail on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of rs. 5000.00 in each cash with one surety of rs. 5000.00 for all three cases. with this order the petition stands of. the petitioners, who is in jail may be informed accordingly

Full Judgment

Sat Pal, J.

(1) The learned Counsel for the petitioner has referred to Section 219 of the Criminal Procedure Code and submits that since all the offences are alleged to have been committed within one year, the accused should be charged with and tried at one trial. He, thereforee, submits that instead of furnishing 3 sureties the accused should be directed to furnish one surety. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and I order that the accused be released on bail on furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 5000.00 in each cash with one surety of Rs. 5000.00 for all three cases. With this order the petition stands of. The petitioners, who is in Jail may be informed accordingly

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial