O.R.G. Systems Vs. Collector of Central Excise

O.R.G. Systems vs Collector of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 13, 1992

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/6891

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/6891
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: H Chander, Vice-, J Balasundaram, K T P.K.
Decided On: Jan 13, 1992
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O.R.G. Systems

Respondent

Collector of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In: (1992)(43)LC718Tri(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. the present miscellaneous application emerges from the tribunal's miscellaneous order no. 8/89-a dated 24.1.1989 1989 (23) ecr 100 (cegat sb-a). shri k.s. nanavati, the learned advocate, has appeared on behalf of the appellants with shri k.m. mehta, advocate. he made a prayer for grant of necessary permission for withdrawal of the miscellaneous application without prejudice to the appellants' right for challenging it before the proper appellate forum. shri chakrabarti, the learned sdr, who appeared on behalf of the revenue does not object. after hearing both the sides, necessary permission for withdrawal of the miscellaneous application is granted without prejudice to the appellants' right for challenging the miscellaneous order no. 8/89-a dated 24.1.1989 [1989 (23) ecr 100 (cegat sb-a)] before the appellate forum or any other remedy available to the appellants in accordance with law. for statistical purposes the miscellaneous application is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. The present Miscellaneous Application emerges from the Tribunal's Miscellaneous Order No. 8/89-A dated 24.1.1989 1989 (23) ECR 100 (Cegat SB-A). Shri K.S. Nanavati, the learned advocate, has appeared on behalf of the appellants with Shri K.M. Mehta, Advocate. He made a prayer for grant of necessary permission for withdrawal of the Miscellaneous application without prejudice to the appellants' right for challenging it before the proper appellate forum. Shri Chakrabarti, the learned SDR, who appeared on behalf of the Revenue does not object. After hearing both the sides, necessary permission for withdrawal of the Miscellaneous application is granted without prejudice to the appellants' right for challenging the Miscellaneous Order No. 8/89-A dated 24.1.1989 [1989 (23) ECR 100 (Cegat SB-A)] before the appellate forum or any other remedy available to the appellants in accordance with law. For statistical purposes the Miscellaneous Application is dismissed.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties O.R.G. Systems vs Collector of Central Excise Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge H Chander, Vice-, J Balasundaram, K T P.K.