Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramesh Singh Vs. State

Ramesh Singh vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 22, 1988
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/686208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1988
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Indian Penal Code - Sections 361, 363 and 366--In the absence of evidence to show that the appellant had given any inducement allurement or threat which influenced the minor to leave her guardian's custody, the trial court was wrong in concluding that the offence of kidnapping was made out. The appellant was ordered...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 361

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh Singh

Advocate Usha Kumari and; M.S. Siddique, Advs

Respondent

State

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 361
Reported In
1988(3)Crimes890; 36(1988)DLT291; 1989(19)DRJ229

Excerpt

indian penal code - sections 361, 363 and 366--in the absence of evidence to show that the appellant had given any inducement allurement or threat which influenced the minor to leave her guardian's custody, the trial court was wrong in concluding that the offence of kidnapping was made out. the appellant was ordered to be released. - (1) in the absence of evidence to show that the appellant had given any inducement allurement or threat which influenced the minor to leave her guardian's custody, the trial court was wrong in concluding that the offence of kidnapping was made out. the appellant was ordered to be released.

Full Judgment

(1) In the absence of evidence to show that the appellant had given any inducement allurement or threat which influenced the minor to leave her guardian's custody, the trial court was wrong in concluding that the offence of kidnapping was made out. The appellant was ordered to be released.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial