Ramesh Kumar Vs. Saraswati

Ramesh Kumar vs Saraswati

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 27, 2000

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/681782

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/681782
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: B.A. Khan, J.
Decided On: Jul 27, 2000
Case Number: FAO No. 408/98
Subject: Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Harassment proceedings - Representation--Second marriage contracted--A child born from this marriage--Contesting a decree of divorce obtain by respondent--Appeal meritless--No scope for interference in findings returned on appreciation of evidence--Dismissed at preliminary hearing. -

Key legal issue: Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramesh Kumar

Advocate Mr. Yash Pal, Proxy Advocat

Respondent

Saraswati

Advocate Mr. Riyaz A. Bhat, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In: 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1145; 88(2000)DLT97; 2000(56)DRJ549

Excerpt

harassment proceedings - representation--second marriage contracted--a child born from this marriage--contesting a decree of divorce obtain by respondent--appeal meritless--no scope for interference in findings returned on appreciation of evidence--dismissed at preliminary hearing. - orderkhan, j.1. appellant has contracted a second marriage sometime in 1993 and had also a son from this marriage in 1995. and yet he is contesting a decree of divorce obtained by respondent. 2. his appeal, thereforee, represents a harassment proceeding. even otherwise it is meritless because it is based on a reasoned judgment and there is hardly any scope for interference in the findings returned on appreciation of evidence. this appeal is, accordingly dismissed on preliminary hearing.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Khan, J.

1. Appellant has contracted a second marriage sometime in 1993 and had also a son from this marriage in 1995. And yet he is contesting a decree of divorce obtained by respondent.

2. His appeal, thereforee, represents a harassment proceeding. Even otherwise it is meritless because it is based on a reasoned judgment and there is hardly any scope for interference in the findings returned on appreciation of evidence. This appeal is, accordingly dismissed on preliminary hearing.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2000 Same Parties Ramesh Kumar vs Saraswati Same Subject Family Same Judge B.A. Khan, J.

Family