Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jitendra Kumar Singh and Ors Vs. Human Resources Department

Jitendra Kumar Singh and Ors vs Human Resources Department

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 18, 2015
~10 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/67477

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendra Kumar Singh and Ors

Respondent

Human Resources Department

Excerpt

.....mangra oraon21. karamchand bhagat22. laldeo bhagat23. baban kumar singh24. dilip kumar singh25. rajesh kumar singh26. shankar kumar vidharthi27. bhajan chakravorty28. sudama rai29. ranjeeta ekka30. dilip bhagat31. shashi bhushn prasad32. ranbir kumar33. kumar kundan mishra34. jai krishna kumar35. ashok kumar36. manoj kumar37. pramod kumar38. sudama singh39. shekh kalim40. pradeep kumar41. pradeep kumar bhagat42. arun kumar das43. rajesh prasad sinha44. ram subhag rai45. naresh kumar singh46. anil kumar choudhary47. navneet kumar gaur48. anup kumar choudhary49. seema toppo50. rajeev ranjan51. santosh bhagat52. sanjeev kumar53. shravan kumar54. fulchand toppo55. mahadeo tana bhagat56. manohar toppo57. arvind kumar mishra58. subodh lal sahu59. jai prakash sahu60. dhruv prasad sahu61. anil oraon -4-62. sarita kujur63. ambika kumari64. jaleshwar bhagat65. arvind kujur66. suprabha rashmi kujur67. sachidanand sahu ….... petitioners vrs.1. the state of jharkhand 2. the director, primary education, govt. of jharkhand 3. the secretary, human resource department, govt. of jharkhand 4. finance secretary, govt. of jharkhand 5. regional director, education, north chhotanagpur division, hazaribagh 6. the deputy commissioner, ramgarh 7. the district superintendent of education, ramgarh 8. the head master -cum- drawing and disbursing officer, govt. middle school, argada, ramgarh ..... respondents with w.p.(s) no.3911 of 2015 1. bipin kumar das 2. nav kumar das 3. jaydhar kumar ….... petitioners vrs.1. the state of jharkhand & others 2. the director, primary education, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi 3. the secretary, h.r.d, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi 4. finance secretary, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi 5. regional director, education, north chhotanagpur division, hazaribag 6. the deputy commissioner, lohardaga 7. the district superintendent of education, lohardaga 8. the head master cum drawing and disbursing officer, upgraded middle school, hesal, lohardaga ..... respondents with.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6135 of 2014 1.Jitendra Kumar Singh 2.Md. Riazuddin Khan 3.Tarkeshwar Singh 4.Santosh Kumar 5.Rabi Shankar 6.Ajay Kumar Mehta 7.Mathura Hazam 8.Subash Kumar 9.Yogendra Ram 10.Kundan Lal Sharma ….... Petitioners Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Finance Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3.The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D Dept., Ranchi 4.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 5.The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E.), Hazaribag 6.The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 102 of 2015

1. Tirthanath Mahtha

2. Lalit Kumar

3. Veena Kumari

4. Ram Lakhan Sahu

5. Dawarika Sahu

6. Shar Dendu Kumar Singh

7. Surendra Ram

8. Naimudeen Ansari

9. Sanjay Kumar Sinha

10. Kumar Sujit Sinha

11. Jaynarayan Singh ….... Petitioners Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 3.The Secretary, Finance Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4.The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D Dept., Ranchi 5.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 6.The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E.), Ramgarh ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 147 of 2015

1. Satyendra Prasad

2. Shivesh Kumar Poddar

3. Sanjay Kishore Poddar

4. Abdul Latif

5. Pradeep Kumar Singh

6. Anil Kumar Agrawal

7. Sanjay Kumar Sinha

8. Salamul Haque -2-

9. Atikur Rahman

10. Sohan Lal Mahto

11. Gyani Kumari ….... Petitioners Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 3.The Secretary, Finance Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4.The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D Dept., Ranchi 5.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 6.The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E.), Ramgarh ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 164 of 2015 Sunil Kumar Ravidas ….... Petitioner Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Finance Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3.The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D Dept., Ranchi 4.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 5.The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 6.The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E.), Ramgarh ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 3401 of 2015

1. Anjay Kumar Agarwal

2. Satyendra Kumar Singh

3. Ram Kumar Sahu

4. Jai Nandan Singh

5. Mathura Mahto

6. Shekhar Chand Patel ….... Petitioners Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand

3. The Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand

4. Finance Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand

5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh

6. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh

7. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh

8. The Head Master -cum- Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Middle School, Argada, Ramgarh ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 3409 of 2015

1. Vinod Kumar Singh

2. Sunil Kumar -3-

3. Ajay Kumar

4. Anand Kumar Dubey

5. Surendra Lal

6. Avinash Ranjan Sinha

7. Anil Prasad

8. Avinash Prasad Sinha

9. Sanjay Kumar Pandey

10. Shailesh Kumar

11. Ashutosh Kumar

12. Shiv Balak Prasad

13. Anmol Kujur

14. Ajit Kumar

15. Arvind Kumar

16. Rajendra Kumar Dhanwar

17. Sri Ram Bhagat

18. Abhimanyu Bhagat

19. Ajay Bhagat

20. Mangra Oraon

21. Karamchand Bhagat

22. Laldeo Bhagat

23. Baban Kumar Singh

24. Dilip Kumar Singh

25. Rajesh Kumar Singh

26. Shankar Kumar Vidharthi

27. Bhajan Chakravorty

28. Sudama Rai

29. Ranjeeta Ekka

30. Dilip Bhagat

31. Shashi Bhushn Prasad

32. Ranbir Kumar

33. Kumar Kundan Mishra

34. Jai Krishna Kumar

35. Ashok Kumar

36. Manoj Kumar

37. Pramod Kumar

38. Sudama Singh

39. Shekh Kalim

40. Pradeep Kumar

41. Pradeep Kumar Bhagat

42. Arun Kumar Das

43. Rajesh Prasad Sinha

44. Ram Subhag Rai

45. Naresh Kumar Singh

46. Anil Kumar Choudhary

47. Navneet Kumar Gaur

48. Anup Kumar Choudhary

49. Seema Toppo

50. Rajeev Ranjan

51. Santosh Bhagat

52. Sanjeev Kumar

53. Shravan Kumar

54. Fulchand Toppo

55. Mahadeo Tana Bhagat

56. Manohar Toppo

57. Arvind Kumar Mishra

58. Subodh Lal Sahu

59. Jai Prakash Sahu

60. Dhruv Prasad Sahu

61. Anil Oraon -4-

62. Sarita Kujur

63. Ambika Kumari

64. Jaleshwar Bhagat

65. Arvind Kujur

66. Suprabha Rashmi Kujur

67. Sachidanand Sahu ….... Petitioners Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand 3. The Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Jharkhand 4. Finance Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand 5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Ramgarh 8. The Head Master -cum- Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Middle School, Argada, Ramgarh ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.3911 of 2015 1. Bipin Kumar Das 2. Nav Kumar Das 3. Jaydhar Kumar ….... Petitioners Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand & others 2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Finance Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Lohardaga 8. The Head Master cum Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Upgraded Middle School, Hesal, Lohardaga ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.3961 of 2015 1.Deo Kant Sharma 2.Ravi Kishore Kumar 3.Rabindra Kumar 4.Ram Kishore Ram 5.Salim Ullah 6.Majharul Hasan 7.Jai Prakash Das 8.Umesh Prajapati ….... Petitioners Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, H.R.D, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Finance Dept., Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3.The Director, Primary Education, H.R.D Dept., Ranchi 4.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Division, Hazaribag 5.The District Superintendent of Education (D.S.E.), Hazaribag 6.The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag -5- ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.4280 of 2015 1. Bidhan Prasad Agarwal 2. Satish Kumar Pathak 3. Md. Abbas 4. Rajan Prasad ….... Petitioners Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, HRD Department, Ranchi 4. Finance Secretary, Government of Jharkhand 5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.4621 of 2015 Smt. Sujata Singh ….... Petitioner Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, HRD Department, Ranchi 4. Finance Secretary, Government of Jharkhand 5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad 8. The Head Master, Rajkiya Madhya Vidhalaya Dhaiya (I.S.M. Campus), Dhanbad ..... Respondents with W.P.(S) No.5006 of 2015 Ram Jitan Sahu ….... Petitioner Vrs.

1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, HRD Department, Ranchi 4. Finance Secretary, Government of Jharkhand 5. Regional Director, Education, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribagh 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga 7. The District Superintendent of Education, Lohardaga 8. The Head Master cum Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Middle School, Bhandra, Lohardaga ..... Respondents -6- ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Kr. Singh & Mr. Ashutosh Mishra For the Respondents :

1. Mr. Abhay Prakash, J.C to G.A., 2. Mr. Pratyush Lala & Jyoti Nayan, J.Cs to G.P.IV3Mr. Yogesh Modi, J.C to Mr. Jai Prakash, AAG4 Mr. Ashish Kumar Shekhar, J.C to G.P.VI5 Mr. Sumir Prasad, S.C.I6 Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, J.C to G.P.1 7. Ms Amrita Banerjee, J.C to Sr. S.C.II8 Mr. Arbind Kumar, J.C to G.P.II0518.12.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In all these writ petitions, petitioners who are Assistant Teachers in Elementary Schools in the State of Jharkhand have sought benefit of Grade-I scale and seniority from their initial date of joining relying upon the judgment rendered in the case of Arun Sinha & others Vrs. State of Jharkhand & others in W.P.(S) No. 638 of 2006 and the judgment passed in L.P.A. No. 214 of 2008 preferred by the State of Jharkhand against the said judgment, which has subsequently been upheld by the Apex Court in S.L.P.(Civil) No. 5520-5522 of 2013 preferred by the State of Jharkhand vide judgment dated 8.3.2013.

3. According to the individual petitioners, they have obtained Teachers' Training qualification during the course of their service career and the delay in acquisition of the Teachers' Training qualification is not on account of their fault. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of these writ petitions the State Government has taken a policy decision contained in resolution no. 3027 dated 14.12.2015. It is submitted that instant resolution has resolved to grant benefit of Grade-I scale and seniority from the date of initial joining to all such Teachers who have been appointed in the year 1987, 1988,1994 and 1999-2000. It is further submitted that the aforesaid resolution has been issued after indulgence of this Court in batch of writ petitions led by W.P.S. No. 2547 of 2014. -7- This Court after taking into account the policy decision, as aforesaid, disposed of the batch of said writ petitions vide judgment dated 17.12.2015 to enable the respondent- District authorities concerned to carry out the exercise in the matter relating to individual petitioners / persons who are entitled to the benefit of such Grade-I scale and seniority from their initial date of joining within stipulated period. Petitioners have therefore made prayer that the instant writ petitions be also disposed of in similar terms.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents in all these matters have submitted that pursuant to the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Arun Sinha & others (supra), the respondent- Department has come out with a policy decision as contained in the said resolution dated 14.12.2015. Cases of such persons / petitioners who fall within the terms of the said policy resolution are required to be examined by the respective District authorities for which directions have also been issued by the Director, Primary Education, after issuance of the said resolution. It is submitted that whether cases of these petitioners fall within the terms and conditions of the said resolution would be examined by the authorities of the respective districts in which petitioners are serving and dependent upon such exercise, those who are found to be entitled, they would be granted the benefit of Grade-I scale and seniority from their initial date of joining in the elementary schools.

5. Considered the submission of the parties in the light of relevant material facts noticed hereinabove. This Court in batch of cases led by W.P.S. No. 2547 of 2014 had occasion to deal with the instant issue where similar claims for grant of Grade-I scale and seniority from their initial date of joining were -8- sought. The said batch of writ petitions have been disposed of in view of the policy decision taken by the State Government as contained in para 15 thereof. In the present batch of writ petitions, most of the writ petitioners claim to be appointed in the year 1994 , 1988 or 1999-2000 except the petitioners in W.P.S. No. 4280 of 2015, wherein some of them were appointed in the year 1982 and 1989. Individual cases of these petitioners are therefore required to be examined in the light of the policy decision dated 14.12.2015 by the respective district authorities.

6. In that view of the matter, the present batch of writ petitions are disposed of in similar terms as directed in the case of Sunil Kumar Bhagat & others (W.P.S. No. 2547 of 2014). The operative portion of the said judgment is quoted herein below for better appreciation.

“9. This issue relating to seniority from the date of initial joining and grant of Grade-I scale to the Assistant Teacher in Primary school has engaged the attention of this Court in several matters. The respondent- State has in due deference to the ratio laid down in the case of Arun Sinha & others (supra) has now taken a policy decision to grant the said benefit as per the terms of the said resolution quoted herein above to individual incumbents. It would now be proper that the cases of individual petitioners who fall within the terms of the resolution dated 14.12.2015, quoted herein above, be considered by the respondents- District authorities. The District Superintendent of Education of respective districts would examine the individual cases as per the procedure laid down by placing the matter before the District Education Establishment Committee for taking an informed decision in respect of individual claims in accordance with law and the aforesaid policy decision within a reasonable time, preferably 16 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

10. It would not be out of place to record appreciation of the efforts taken by the State counsels and the respondent- Department in coming out with the policy resolution, which may possibly reduce institution of large number of cases with similar grievances in this Court.

11. All the writ petitions are accordingly disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions. Pending I.A.s also stand closed”.

7. All these writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. A. Mohanty (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial