Mona Aresh Goel Vs. Aresh Satya Goel

Mona Aresh Goel vs Aresh Satya Goel

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Mar 21, 2000

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/667273

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/667273
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: S.P. Bharucha,; S.S.M. Quadri and; M.B. Shah, JJ.
Decided On: Mar 21, 2000
Case Number: Transfer Petn. (C) No. 793 of 1999
Subject: Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mona Aresh Goel

Respondent

Aresh Satya Goel

Legal References

Reported In: AIR2000SC3512; JT2000(3)SC603; (2000)9SCC255

Excerpt

- order1. the respondent-husband has been served but does not appear.2. the transfer petition is filed by the wife to transfer the divorce proceedings taken by the husband in bombay to delhi, where she now stays with her parents. the transfer petition avers that the wife has no independent income and that her parents are not in a position to bear the expenses of her travel from delhi to bombay to contest the divorce proceedings. she avers that she is twenty two years old and cannot travel to and stay in bombay alone for, there is no one in bombay with whom she can stay. we are of the opinion that the transfer petition should, in the circumstances, be allowed.3. the transfer petition is made absolute in terms of prayer (a), m.j. petition no. a-636 of 1999 pending before the family court at bandra, bombay is transferred to the court of the district judge, tis hazari, delhi, who shall hear it. himself or assign it for hearing to a competent court.4. no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The respondent-husband has been served but does not appear.

2. The transfer petition is filed by the wife to transfer the divorce proceedings taken by the husband in Bombay to Delhi, where she now stays with her parents. The transfer petition avers that the wife has no independent income and that her parents are not in a position to bear the expenses of her travel from Delhi to Bombay to contest the divorce proceedings. She avers that she is twenty two years old and cannot travel to and stay in Bombay alone for, there is no one in Bombay with whom she can stay. We are of the opinion that the transfer petition should, in the circumstances, be allowed.

3. The transfer petition is made absolute in terms of prayer (a), M.J. Petition No. A-636 of 1999 pending before the family Court at Bandra, Bombay is transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi, who shall hear it. himself or assign it for hearing to a competent Court.

4. No order as to costs.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2000 Same Parties Mona Aresh Goel vs Aresh Satya Goel Same Subject Family Same Judge S.P. Bharucha,; S.S.M. Quadri and; M.B. Shah, JJ.

Family