Sheela Devi Vs. Jaspal Singh

Sheela Devi vs Jaspal Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Jul 13, 1998

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/666096

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/666096
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Sujata V. Manohar and; G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.
Decided On: Jul 13, 1998
Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 3236 of 1998 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 17936 of 1997)
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Civil - remedy - Section 18 of Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - respondent filed writ petition before High Court - High Court re-examined facts - no reason given by respondent for not availing remedy of revision under Section 18 - impugned Order of High Court set a...

Key legal issue: Civil
Acts & sections: Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 18

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sheela Devi

Respondent

Jaspal Singh

Legal References

Acts: Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 18
Reported In: AIR1999SC2859; (1999)1SCC209

Excerpt

civil - remedy - section 18 of uttar pradesh urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) act, 1972 - respondent filed writ petition before high court - high court re-examined facts - no reason given by respondent for not availing remedy of revision under section 18 - impugned order of high court set aside. - order1. leave granted.2. no reason has been given by the respondent for not availing of the remedy of revision under section 18 of the u.p. urban buildings (regulation of letting, rent and eviction) act, 1972. the respondent straightway filed a writ petition before the high court where the high court had re-examined the facts. the impugnedorder of the high court is set aside. the respondent will be at liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of revision, if he so desires.3. the appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. No reason has been given by the respondent for not availing of the remedy of revision under Section 18 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. The respondent straightway filed a writ petition before the High Court where the High Court had re-examined the facts. The impugnedorder of the High Court is set aside. The respondent will be at liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of revision, if he so desires.

3. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 1998 Same Parties Sheela Devi vs Jaspal Singh Same Subject Civil Same Judge Sujata V. Manohar and; G.B. Pattanaik, JJ. Acts & Sections Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent an...

Civil