Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sardar Bhupinder Singh and anr. Vs. Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and anr.

Sardar Bhupinder Singh and anr. vs Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Feb 03, 1988
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/660862

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Appeal No. 78 of 1988
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- [ G.L. Oza and; B.C. Ray, JJ.] -- Criminal Trial — Sentence — Reduction of — Old age — Accused an old man of 65 years in jail for about 2 months — Sentence reduced to one already undergone and fine imposed — Sentence of other accused reduced to 6 months imprisonment with fine -...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sardar Bhupinder Singh and anr.

Respondent

Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and anr.

Legal References

Reported In
1990Supp(1)SCC137

Excerpt

- [ g.l. oza and; b.c. ray, jj.] -- criminal trial - sentence - reduction of - old age - accused an old man of 65 years in jail for about 2 months - sentence reduced to one already undergone and fine imposed - sentence of other accused reduced to 6 months imprisonment with fine -- so far as appellant/accused 2 sardar manmohan singh is concerned, his sentence is reduced to that of six months imprisonment with a fine of rs 5000. this case may not be treated as a precedent.g.l. oza and; b.c. ray, jj.1. special leave granted. heard learned counsel on both sides.2. in the special facts and circumstances of this case it is directed that so far as appellant/accused 1 sardar bhupinder singh is concerned, he has been in jail for about two months and he is an old man of 65 years, in our opinion the sentence already undergone and additionally a fine of rs 5000 would meet the ends of justice. so far as appellant/accused 2 sardar manmohan singh is concerned, his sentence is reduced to that of six months imprisonment with a fine of rs 5000. this case may not be treated as a precedent.3. the appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

G.L. Oza and; B.C. Ray, JJ.

1. Special leave granted. Heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. In the special facts and circumstances of this case it is directed that so far as appellant/accused 1 Sardar Bhupinder Singh is concerned, he has been in jail for about two months and he is an old man of 65 years, in our opinion the sentence already undergone and additionally a fine of Rs 5000 would meet the ends of justice. So far as appellant/accused 2 Sardar Manmohan Singh is concerned, his sentence is reduced to that of six months imprisonment with a fine of Rs 5000. This case may not be treated as a precedent.

3. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial