Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ali Ahmad and Others Vs. State of U.P.

Ali Ahmad and Others vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Feb 26, 1998
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/647248

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl. A. No. 1532 of 1995
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - The evidence of four witnesses, namely, Nathu, Dilawar, Jameelan and Nanhey clearly establishes that Mahmood died as a result of the shots fired by Ali Ahmad and Mahmod Sher and that Jameelan and Nanhey received injuries as a result of the shots fired by those two accused. The manner in which the appellants ha...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 302, 307 and 324

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ali Ahmad and Others

Respondent

State of U.P.

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 149, 302, 307 and 324
Reported In
1998IIAD(SC)281; AIR1998SC1232; 1998CriLJ1637; 1998(1)Crimes211(SC); JT1998(2)SC241; 1998(2)SCALE118

Excerpt

- - the evidence of four witnesses, namely, nathu, dilawar, jameelan and nanhey clearly establishes that mahmood died as a result of the shots fired by ali ahmad and mahmod sher and that jameelan and nanhey received injuries as a result of the shots fired by those two accused. the manner in which the appellants had assaulted nathu initially and chased him right up to the house of mahmood, their entering the house of mahmood and then firing shots at him and his wife and child, when mahmood had protested, clearly indicate that both ali ahmad and mahmod sher had acted in concert and it was in furtherance of their common intention that they had caused death of mahmood and bodily injuries to jameelan and nanhey.orderjudgment pronounced by nanavati, j.1. we have heard learned counsel and also gone through the evidence and the judgment of the high court. we find that the findings recorded by the high court are correct. the evidence of four witnesses, namely, nathu, dilawar, jameelan and nanhey clearly establishes that mahmood died as a result of the shots fired by ali ahmad and mahmod sher and that jameelan and nanhey received injuries as a result of the shots fired by those two accused. the manner in which the appellants had assaulted nathu initially and chased him right up to the house of mahmood, their entering the house of mahmood and then firing shots at him and his wife and child, when mahmood had protested, clearly indicate that both ali ahmad and mahmod sher had acted in concert and it was in furtherance of their common intention that they had caused death of mahmood and bodily injuries to jameelan and nanhey. the high court was, therefore, right in convicting ali ahmad and mahmod sher for the offences punishable under section 302 read with 34 ipc and section 307 read with 34 ipc. the other three accused were rightly convicted under section 324 read with section 149 ipc only.2. this appeal is, therefore, dismissed.3. the appellant nos. 2-5 are on bail.their bail bonds are cancelled. they are directed to serve out the remaining part of their sentence.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Judgment pronounced by Nanavati, J.

1. We have heard learned counsel and also gone through the evidence and the judgment of the High Court. We find that the findings recorded by the High Court are correct. The evidence of four witnesses, namely, Nathu, Dilawar, Jameelan and Nanhey clearly establishes that Mahmood died as a result of the shots fired by Ali Ahmad and Mahmod Sher and that Jameelan and Nanhey received injuries as a result of the shots fired by those two accused. The manner in which the appellants had assaulted Nathu initially and chased him right up to the house of Mahmood, their entering the house of Mahmood and then firing shots at him and his wife and child, when Mahmood had protested, clearly indicate that both Ali Ahmad and Mahmod Sher had acted in concert and it was in furtherance of their common intention that they had caused death of Mahmood and bodily injuries to Jameelan and Nanhey. The High Court was, therefore, right in convicting Ali Ahmad and Mahmod Sher for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and Section 307 read with 34 IPC. The other three accused were rightly convicted under Section 324 read with Section 149 IPC only.

2. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

3. The appellant Nos. 2-5 are on bail.

Their bail bonds are cancelled. They are directed to serve out the remaining part of their sentence.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial