Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

L.S. Raju Vs. State of Mysore

L.S. Raju vs State of Mysore

Disposition Application allowed Court Supreme Court of India Decided May 29, 1952
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/643030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Application allowed
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 527; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1952

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

L.S. Raju

Respondent

State of Mysore

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 527; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1952
Reported In
AIR1953SC435

Excerpt

- orderpatanjali sastri, c.j.1. this is a clear case for transfer. the petitioner has been convicted of an attempt to murder by poisoning mr. medappa the chief justice of mysore, on whose complaint the proceedings were instituted. the case aroused considerable local excitement and sensation, and having regard to the position of the complainant as the head of the judiciary, the trial had to be held before a judge specially brought down from bombay. this, however, made no difference to the forum of appeal which was still the high court at mysore and the petitioner accordingly filed his appeal in that court. he now prays for a transfer of the appeal to some other high court as he apprehends that he will not have a fair and impartial hearing of the appeal in the mysore, high court which is presided over by the complainant.2. this is obviously a weighty ground for the transfer of the case, and the advocate-general of the respondent state leaves the matter entirely in cur hands. for any sound and reputable system of administration of justice it is as important that justice should appear to be done as that it is, in fact, done, and it is no reflection on the independence and impartiality of the learned judges of the mysore high court to say that the ends of justice plainly require in the circumstances of this case that this appeal should be transferred to a court outside the state of mysore. we accordingly transfer the appeal to the high court at bombay for disposal.3. the printing of the necessary records and other preliminary matters will be carried out under the directions of that court.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Patanjali Sastri, C.J.

1. This is a clear case for transfer. The petitioner has been convicted of an attempt to murder by poisoning Mr. Medappa the Chief Justice of Mysore, on whose complaint the proceedings were instituted. The case aroused considerable local excitement and sensation, and having regard to the position of the complainant as the head of the judiciary, the trial had to be held before a Judge specially brought down from Bombay. This, however, made no difference to the forum of appeal which was still the High Court at Mysore and the petitioner accordingly filed his appeal in that Court. He now prays for a transfer of the appeal to some other High Court as he apprehends that he will not have a fair and impartial hearing of the appeal in the Mysore, High Court which is presided over by the complainant.

2. This is obviously a weighty ground for the transfer of the case, and the Advocate-General of the respondent State leaves the matter entirely in cur hands. For any sound and reputable system of administration of justice it is as important that justice should appear to be done as that it is, in fact, done, and it is no reflection on the independence and impartiality of the learned Judges of the Mysore High Court to say that the ends of justice plainly require in the circumstances of this case that this appeal should be transferred to a Court outside the State of Mysore. We accordingly transfer the appeal to the High Court at Bombay for disposal.

3. The printing of the necessary records and other preliminary matters will be carried out under the directions of that Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial