Dara Vs. State of Punjab

Dara vs State of Punjab

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Oct 09, 2002

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/634174

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/634174
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Judge: R.L. Anand, J.
Decided On: Oct 09, 2002
Case Number: Criminal Misc. No. 13784-M of 2000
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Petition dismissed
Acts & sections: Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16 and 85

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dara

Advocate D.S. Rajput, Adv.

Respondent

State of Punjab

Advocate M.C. Berry, Sr. DAG

Legal References

Acts: Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16 and 85
Reported In: 2003(86)ECC138

Excerpt

- orderr.l. anand, j.1. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the fir, therefore, the fir is liable to be quashed. thissubmission raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner has been controverted and disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. the question of indentity is involved in this case. therefore, the fir in this case cannot be quashed. the petition is dismissed with the observation that the petitioner will be permitted to take all the pleas which have been taken in the present petition before the trial court.

Full Judgment

ORDER

R.L. Anand, J.

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR, therefore, the FIR is liable to be quashed. Thissubmission raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner has been controverted and disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. The question of indentity is involved in this case. Therefore, the FIR in this case cannot be quashed. The petition is dismissed with the observation that the petitioner will be permitted to take all the pleas which have been taken in the present petition before the trial Court.

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2002 Same Parties Dara vs State of Punjab Same Subject Criminal Same Judge R.L. Anand, J. Acts & Sections Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Secti...

Criminal