Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy Vs. Mani

Joy vs Mani

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Aug 14, 2015
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/63156

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy

Respondent

Mani

Excerpt

non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.6319 of2015(arising out of slp(c)no.11809 of 2015) joy ... appellant(s) vs. mani ... respondent(s) with civil appeal no.6320/2015 @ slp(c)no.10539/2015 & civil appeal no.6321/2015 @ slp(c)no.11814/2015 judgmentanil r. dave, j.1. leave granted.2. we are happy to note that the parties to the litigation have settled their dispute amicably before the mediator.3. in the circumstances, it is directed that the parties shall place the terms of agreement before the trial court for appropriate orders.4. in view of the said settlement, the decree is quashed and the appeals are disposed of as allowed.5. pending applications stand disposed of.6. the trial court may pass appropriate orders and decree in terms of agreement arrived at between the parties.7. the amount of interest is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent. ..............j.[anil r. dave]. ..............j.[v. gopala gowada]. new delhi; 14th august, 2015.

Full Judgment

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6319 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)No.11809 of 2015) JOY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. MANI ... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.6320/2015 @ SLP(C)NO.10539/2015 & CIVIL APPEAL NO.6321/2015 @ SLP(C)NO.11814/2015

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. We are happy to note that the parties to the litigation have settled their dispute amicably before the Mediator.

3. In the circumstances, it is directed that the parties shall place the Terms of Agreement before the trial court for appropriate orders.

4. In view of the said settlement, the decree is quashed and the appeals are disposed of as allowed.

5. Pending applications stand disposed of.

6. The trial court may pass appropriate orders and decree in terms of agreement arrived at between the parties.

7. The amount of interest is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent. ..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]. ..............J.

[V. GOPALA GOWADA]. New Delhi; 14th August, 2015.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial