Joy Vs. Mani

Joy vs Mani

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Aug 14, 2015

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/63156

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/63156
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Anil R. Dave and v. Gopala Gowda
Decided On: Aug 14, 2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy

Respondent

Mani

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Excerpt

non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.6319 of2015(arising out of slp(c)no.11809 of 2015) joy ... appellant(s) vs. mani ... respondent(s) with civil appeal no.6320/2015 @ slp(c)no.10539/2015 & civil appeal no.6321/2015 @ slp(c)no.11814/2015 judgmentanil r. dave, j.1. leave granted.2. we are happy to note that the parties to the litigation have settled their dispute amicably before the mediator.3. in the circumstances, it is directed that the parties shall place the terms of agreement before the trial court for appropriate orders.4. in view of the said settlement, the decree is quashed and the appeals are disposed of as allowed.5. pending applications stand disposed of.6. the trial court may pass appropriate orders and decree in terms of agreement arrived at between the parties.7. the amount of interest is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent. ..............j.[anil r. dave]. ..............j.[v. gopala gowada]. new delhi; 14th august, 2015.

Full Judgment

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6319 OF2015(Arising out of SLP(C)No.11809 of 2015) JOY ... APPELLANT(S) VS. MANI ... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.6320/2015 @ SLP(C)NO.10539/2015 & CIVIL APPEAL NO.6321/2015 @ SLP(C)NO.11814/2015

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. We are happy to note that the parties to the litigation have settled their dispute amicably before the Mediator.

3. In the circumstances, it is directed that the parties shall place the Terms of Agreement before the trial court for appropriate orders.

4. In view of the said settlement, the decree is quashed and the appeals are disposed of as allowed.

5. Pending applications stand disposed of.

6. The trial court may pass appropriate orders and decree in terms of agreement arrived at between the parties.

7. The amount of interest is permitted to be withdrawn by the respondent. ..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]. ..............J.

[V. GOPALA GOWADA]. New Delhi; 14th August, 2015.