Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Assistant Controller of Estate Vs. Tirath Ram Hand

Assistant Controller of Estate vs Tirath Ram Hand

Type Court Judgment Court Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi Decided Nov 06, 1986
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/62229

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Direct Taxation

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Direct Taxation

Key legal issue
Direct Taxation

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Assistant Controller of Estate

Respondent

Tirath Ram Hand

Legal References

Reported In
(1987)20ITD80a(Delhi)

Excerpt

.....and computed it at rs. 49,448 and included in the principal value of the estate of the deceased.3. on appeal the appellate controller held that clause 3 of the partnership deed dated 13-4-1977 of the firm of jaycee machinery mart provided that in the case of death of a partner, the partnership would stand dissolved and the legal heir of the deceased would have no claim on the goodwill of the said business and, therefore, it could not be said that any goodwill belonged to the assessee and that it passed on the death of the deceased. he directed the deletion of the addition of rs. 49,448.4. filing an appeal against this order of the appellate controller, the department contended before us that as per recent decision of the supreme court in ced v. mrudula nareshchandra [1986] 160 itr 342 goodwill is an asset passing on the death of a partner notwithstanding a clause to the contrary in the partnership deed.5. though the learned representative for the accountable person made an attempt to distinguish this decision, the legal position in regard to the passing of goodwill on the death of a partner in a firm having thus been enunciated by the supreme court, it is no more open to urge that goodwill does not pass on the death of a partner all because there was a stipulation in the partnership deed to the contrary. we, therefore, hold that the share of the goodwill of the deceased in the abovesaid firm passed on his death and its value was includible in the principal value of the estate. the quantum of the share of goodwill not having been disputed before us, we do not wish to express any opinion thereon.

Full Judgment

1. This is an appeal filed by the Assistant Controller against the order of the Appellate Controller by which he held that the assessee's share in the goodwill, which was computed at Rs. 49,448 was not to be included as an asset passing on the death of the deceased.

2. The deceased Shri Tirath Ram Hand, who died on 14-8-1981, was a partner in a firm called Jaycee Machinery Mart. In computing the estate liable to estate duty, the deceased's share in the goodwill of the firm of Jaycee Machinery Mart was not taken into account but the Assistant Controller on the other hand was of the opinion that there was goodwill attached to that firm and computed it at Rs. 49,448 and included in the principal value of the estate of the deceased.

3. On appeal the Appellate Controller held that Clause 3 of the partnership deed dated 13-4-1977 of the firm of Jaycee Machinery Mart provided that in the case of death of a partner, the partnership would stand dissolved and the legal heir of the deceased would have no claim on the goodwill of the said business and, therefore, it could not be said that any goodwill belonged to the assessee and that it passed on the death of the deceased. He directed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 49,448.

4. Filing an appeal against this order of the Appellate Controller, the department contended before us that as per recent decision of the Supreme Court in CED v. Mrudula Nareshchandra [1986] 160 ITR 342 goodwill is an asset passing on the death of a partner notwithstanding a clause to the contrary in the partnership deed.

5. Though the learned representative for the accountable person made an attempt to distinguish this decision, the legal position in regard to the passing of goodwill on the death of a partner in a firm having thus been enunciated by the Supreme Court, it is no more open to urge that goodwill does not pass on the death of a partner all because there was a stipulation in the partnership deed to the contrary. We, therefore, hold that the share of the goodwill of the deceased in the abovesaid firm passed on his death and its value was includible in the principal value of the estate. The quantum of the share of goodwill not having been disputed before us, we do not wish to express any opinion thereon.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial