Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Albert David Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Albert David Ltd. vs Collector of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 10, 1991
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/6189

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Albert David Ltd.

Respondent

Collector of Customs

Legal References

Reported In
(1991)(32)ECC242

Excerpt

.....29-7-1985. the lower authorities dismissed the claim on the ground that, in accordance with technical literature, the goods would be classifiable not as low density but as medium density polyethylene since its density was, according to the manufacturer's catalogue, 0.926 - 0.929, whereas, in accordance with the encyclopaedia of polymer science and technology, volume 6, low density polyethylene had a density of 0.910 - 0.925, medium density polyethylene 0.926 - 0.940 and high density polyethylene 0.941 - 0.965. hence this appeal.2. we have heard shri h.p. kabra, vice president (materials & export), of the appellant company and shri m. jayaraman, sdr, for the respondent-collector. shri kabra submitted that there was no definition either in the tariff entry or in the notification no. 235/cus/85, of low density polyethylene. the classification under heading 39.01/06 of the schedule was not in dispute. shri kabra relied on the explanatory notes under heading 3901.10 and 3901.20 appearing in the harmonised commodity description and coding system - volume 2 page 557. the two headings are for 'polyethylene' having specific gravity of less than 0.94 and 'polyethylene' having specific gravity of 0.94 or more. the explanatory note reads as follows :- "polyethylene is a translucent material having a very wide range of applications. low density polyethylene (ldpe), i.e. polyethylene having a specific gravity at 20c of less than 0.94 (calculated on an additive-free polymer basis), is used largely as a packaging film especially for food products, as coating for paper, fibreboard, aluminium foil, etc., as an electric insulator, and for the manufacture of various household articles, toys, etc. the heading also includes linear low density polyethylene (lldpe). high density polyethylene (hdpe) is polyethylene having a specific gravity at 20c of 0.94 or more (calculated on an additive-free polymer basis). it is used in the manufacture of a variety of blow-moulded and.....

Full Judgment

1. The dispute in this appeal concerns the levy of basic customs duty under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 ("the Schedule", for short) on a consignment of Polyethylene Moulding Grade (Lupolen 3020 D). The goods were assessed under Heading 39.01/06 of the Schedule at the rate of 100% ad valorem plus the applicable auxiliary duty of customs and additional duty of customs. After clearance of the goods, the appellants filed a claim for refund based on the ground that the goods attracted the concessional rate of duty applicable to low density polyethylene in accordance with Customs Notification No. 235/85 dated 29-7-1985. The lower authorities dismissed the claim on the ground that, in accordance with technical literature, the goods would be classifiable not as low density but as medium density polyethylene since its density was, according to the manufacturer's catalogue, 0.926 - 0.929, whereas, in accordance with the Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Volume 6, low density polyethylene had a density of 0.910 - 0.925, Medium Density Polyethylene 0.926 - 0.940 and High Density Polyethylene 0.941 - 0.965. Hence this appeal.

2. We have heard Shri H.P. Kabra, Vice President (Materials & Export), of the appellant company and Shri M. Jayaraman, SDR, for the respondent-Collector. Shri Kabra submitted that there was no definition either in the Tariff Entry or in the Notification No. 235/Cus/85, of Low Density Polyethylene. The classification under Heading 39.01/06 of the Schedule was not in dispute. Shri Kabra relied on the Explanatory Notes under Heading 3901.10 and 3901.20 appearing in the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System - Volume 2 page 557. The two headings are for 'Polyethylene' having specific gravity of less than 0.94 and 'Polyethylene' having specific gravity of 0.94 or more. The Explanatory Note reads as follows :- "Polyethylene is a translucent material having a very wide range of applications. Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE), i.e. polyethylene having a specific gravity at 20C of less than 0.94 (calculated on an additive-free polymer basis), is used largely as a packaging film especially for food products, as coating for paper, fibreboard, aluminium foil, etc., as an electric insulator, and for the manufacture of various household articles, toys, etc. The heading also includes linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE). High density polyethylene (HDPE) is polyethylene having a specific gravity at 20C of 0.94 or more (calculated on an additive-free polymer basis).

It is used in the manufacture of a variety of blow-moulded and injection-moulded articles, woven sacks gasoline and oil containers, for the extrusion of pipes, etc. Applications of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers include snap-on caps, the lining of bag-in-box containers and stretch wrapping." It was, however, submitted by Shri Jayaraman, DR, that, at the relevant time, the Indian Customs Tariff was not based on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System of the Customs Co-operation Council Nomenclature, Brussels. It was based on the Brussel's Tariff Nomenclature or the C.C.C.N. and that nomenclature had not made any distinction between low and high density polyethylene at the relevant time; nor does the notification define 'LDPE'. The Collector (Appeals) had relied on the authoritative Encyclopaedia of Polymer Science which classified polyethylene into three well defined categories of low, medium and high densities. The notification covered only the low density variety.

3. We have considered the rival submissions. It is true that neither heading 39.01/06 nor the notification defines low density polyethylene.

Though the Customs Tariff, at the relevant time, was not based on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System, it is, in our opinion, permissible to refer to the distinction between low density and high density polyethylene in that nomenclature, since that also is a nomenclature pertaining to International trade and commerce and has since been adopted in India as well. This nomenclature does not use the words 'low', 'medium' or 'high' density in the relevant headings.

However, from the Explanatory Notes, it is clear that polyethylene having specific gravity of less than 0.940 is considered as Low Density Polyethylene and that having specific gravity of 0.94 or more as high density polyethylene. In the absence of any definition of 'LDPE' in the Customs Tariff heading or in the Notification 235/85-Cus., we think it is reasonable to adopt the definition given in the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal with consequential relief.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial