Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Juria Vs. State of Orissa

Juria vs State of Orissa

Type Court Judgment Court Orissa Decided Dec 21, 1984
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/533444

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Orissa High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - Circular Dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier Circular Dated 18.6.198...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Juria

Respondent

State of Orissa

Legal References

Reported In
1985CriLJ1487

Excerpt

- labour & services pay scale:[tarun chatterjee & r.m. lodha,jj] fixation - orissa service code (1939), rule 74(b) promotion - government servant, by virtue of rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - circular dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier circular dated 18.6.1982 resulting in reduction of pay of employee on promotion held, it is not legal. statutory rules cannot be altered or amended by such executive orders or circulars or instructions nor can they replace statutory rules. - 2. accused of commission of an offence of murder, the petitioner seeks his release on bail after unsuccessfully moving the court of session. 5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the sessions judge, ganjam, berhampur......judge. production of under-trial prisoners in custody for the expeditious disposal of sessions cases is as important as any other matter for which police personnel may be urgently necessary. in a large number of sessions cases pending in different courts, we have noticed that the under-trial prisoners are not being produced on many dates on the same ground. this is, indeed, unfortunate. a prisoner may not be released on bail merely on the ground of some delay in his trial. in the circumstances of the case, however, in spite of the specific order passed by this court for expeditious trial, the petitioner has not been produced in custody in the court of the learned sessions judge on a number of dates. it would be just and reasonable, in our view, to admit the petitioner to bail in the circumstances of the case.4. we would allow the application and direct the release of the petitioner on a bail of rs. 5,000/- (rupees five thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the sessions judge, ganjam, berhampur.5. copies of this order shall be sent by the registrar (judicial) of this court to the chief secretary to the government of orissa and the director-general of police, orissa, for their information.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. We have heard Mr. Das for the petitioner and Mr. N. C Panigrahi, the learned Additional Government Advocate.

2. Accused of commission of an offence of murder, the petitioner seeks his release on bail after unsuccessfully moving the Court of Session. In Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 404 of 1984, this .Court had rejected an application for his release on bail by its order dt July, 2 1984, with a direction for expeditious trial.

3. It has been brought to our notice that in spite of the specific order passed by this Court for expeditious trial, the police authorities have not produced the petitioner, who is in custody and is said to be ailing, in the court of the learned Sessions Judge since July 17,1984 and there have been a number of adjournments for the non-production of the petitioner in custody on the ground of shortage of police personnel in spite of issue of escort requisitions by the learned Sessions Judge. Production of under-trial prisoners in custody for the expeditious disposal of Sessions cases is as important as any other matter for which police personnel may be urgently necessary. In a large number of Sessions cases pending in different courts, we have noticed that the under-trial prisoners are not being produced on many dates on the same ground. This is, indeed, unfortunate. A prisoner may not be released on bail merely on the ground of some delay in his trial. In the circumstances of the case, however, in spite of the specific order passed by this Court for expeditious trial, the petitioner has not been produced in custody in the court of the learned Sessions Judge on a number of dates. It would be just and reasonable, in our view, to admit the petitioner to bail in the circumstances of the case.

4. We would allow the application and direct the release of the petitioner on a bail of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Ganjam, Berhampur.

5. Copies of this order shall be sent by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to the Chief Secretary to the Government of Orissa and the Director-General of Police, Orissa, for their information.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial