Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 572 of 2003 Ram Kripal Tiwari …. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and another ..... Opposite Parties Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha For the opp. party/ respondent : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 As prayed for, counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the address of the opposite party no.
2. Issue notice to opposite party no.2. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to file requisites etc. for issuance of notice to opposite party no.2 under registered cover with A/d as well as ordinary within a week, failing which this revision application shall stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench. The petitioner is physically present in Court. As opposite party no. 2 is living in the house of the petitioner, counsel for the petitioner is directed to request the petitioner to bring her ( opposite party no.
2) in Court on the next date. Put up this case on 24.7.2015. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal No. 791 of 2010 Kunti Kumari …. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. Rajiv Lochan For the opp. party/ respondent : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 IA No. 1438 of 2015 has been filed on behalf of the appellant under section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to suspend the operation of the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court in Special Case No. 9 of 2009. Let this appeal itself be heard on 24.7.2015. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI … …. Petitioner Versus Amna Khatoon ...........Opposite Party Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. For the opp. party/ respondent : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 Issue notice to the sole opposite party no 2 for which requisites etc under registered cover with A/d as well as ordinary process must be filed within a week, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Put up this case on …........ Till the next date, further proceedings in Misc. Case No. …................ pending in the court of …............................shall remain stayed. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 3591 of 2015 Pawan Kumar Sahu .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party. Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr Nilesh Kumar For the opp. party/ respondents : Addl.P.P./ Sanjay Kumar 26.06.2015 Counsel for the petitioner is directed to implead the complainant Yogesh Kumar @ Yogesh Kumar Sahu as opposite party no.2 in this case. Since the newly added opposite party no.2 has already appeared, there is no need to issue notice. On the previous occasion, it was submitted by Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, that a talk of compromise is going on between the parties and on his prayer this case was adjourned. Today again, the same prayer has been made and the other side is also ready to settle the matter outside the Court, but as the petitioner is in custody, there is none in the house of the petitioner to settle the matter on his behalf . So, prayer of the counsel for the petitioner is to enlarge him ( petitioner ) on provisional bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on provisional bail till 17.8.2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Doranda (Argora) PS Case No. 372 of 2013 (GR No. 4142 of 2013) to enable the petitioner to settle the matter with opposite party no.2. This provisional bail is subject to deposit of Rs.6,75,000/- ( rupees six lacs and seventy five thousand ) by way of fixed deposit in the joint names of the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 in the court below. The amount must be deposited by the petitioner in the court below within a fortnight after his release on provisional bail. No party shall be allowed to withdraw the amount during the pendency of this application in this Court. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. …... of 2014 … …. Petitioner Versus Amna Khatoon ...........Opposite Party Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. For the opp. party/ respondent : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 Issue notice to the sole opposite party no 2 for which requisites etc under registered cover with A/d as well as ordinary process must be filed within a week, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Put up this case on …........ Till the next date, further proceedings in Misc. Case No. …................ pending in the court of …............................shall remain stayed. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. …... of 2014 … …. Petitioner Versus Amna Khatoon ...........Opposite Party Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr. For the opp. party/ respondent : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 Issue notice to the sole opposite party no 2 for which requisites etc under registered cover with A/d as well as ordinary process must be filed within a week, failing which this revision application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Put up this case on …........ Till the next date, further proceedings in Misc. Case No. …................ pending in the court of …............................shall remain stayed. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. ….......of 201 ….... .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party. Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner/ appellant (s): Mr For the opp. party/ respondents : Addl.P.P. 26.06.2015 This revision application is admitted for hearing. Issue notice. Call for the lower court record. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner along with other accused namely …................... has been convicted for the offence punishable under sections …....................of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for …............ under section …......... IPC, …............. On appeal preferred against the said order, the appellate court acquitted the petitioner of the charge under section …......... IPC, but affirmed the conviction and sentence under other sections of the Indian Penal Code. …............. Even then the petitioner is in custody since ….......... Hence, he deserves to be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no serious objection. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel and the period in custody, during the pendency of this revision application, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of …................ in connection with ….............. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. Ambastha/- ( R. N. Verma, J.
)