Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kamla and ors. Vs. Durga and ors.

Kamla and ors. vs Durga and ors.

Disposition Appeal allowed Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 20, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/512476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
M.A. No. 442 of 1999
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Appeal allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Appeal allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamla and ors.

Advocate Arun Sharma, Adv.

Respondent

Durga and ors.

Advocate M.P. Agrawal, Adv.

Legal References

Reported In
2005ACJ1497

Excerpt

- .....witness is cross-examined but no suggestion is given to him regarding income of the deceased. however, aw 1 kamla pachoriya has not been cross-examined on the question of income of the deceased.5. when witnesses have deposed that deceased was earning rs. 4,500 per month, finding of claims tribunal that the income of the deceased was rs. 2,500 per month is set aside as it is contrary to evidence on record. claims tribunal has presumed the monthly income of deceased without any material on record. therefore, we hold that income of deceased was rs. 4,500 per month, i.e., rs. 54,000 per year. deceased was 31 years of age. since, the income of deceased was determined at rs. 54,000 per year, the dependency is determined at rs. 36,000 and to this figure multiplier of 17 is applied considering the age of the deceased. thus, claimants are entitled for rs. 6,12,000 and further sum of rs. 18,000 under various heads such as loss of consortium and funeral expenses, etc. total sum payable to claimants is rs. 6,30,000.over and above this amount, appellants shall be entitled for interest at the rate of seven per cent on the enhanced amount of compensation from the date of award.6. appellant nos. 2 to 6 are minors. therefore, we direct that the amount of compensation be deposited in a nationalised bank and claimants will be entitled for monthly interest.7. the appeal succeeds and is allowed with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

S.S. Jha and A.K. Shrivastava, JJ.

1. This appeal is for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal.

2. Counsel for respondents has supported the award.

3. Findings on the other issues are not under challenge in this appeal. Appeal is confined to enhancement of compensation only.

4. The counsel for the appellants submitted that he has led evidence regarding income of the deceased Om Narayan. AW 1, Kamla Pachoriya has deposed that Om Narayan used to earn Rs. 4,500 per month. Similarly, AW 3 Santosh Kumar deposed that he was paying Rs. 4,500 per month to deceased Om Narayan. This witness is cross-examined but no suggestion is given to him regarding income of the deceased. However, AW 1 Kamla Pachoriya has not been cross-examined on the question of income of the deceased.

5. When witnesses have deposed that deceased was earning Rs. 4,500 per month, finding of Claims Tribunal that the income of the deceased was Rs. 2,500 per month is set aside as it is contrary to evidence on record. Claims Tribunal has presumed the monthly income of deceased without any material on record. Therefore, we hold that income of deceased was Rs. 4,500 per month, i.e., Rs. 54,000 per year. Deceased was 31 years of age. Since, the income of deceased was determined at Rs. 54,000 per year, the dependency is determined at Rs. 36,000 and to this figure multiplier of 17 is applied considering the age of the deceased. Thus, claimants are entitled for Rs. 6,12,000 and further sum of Rs. 18,000 under various heads such as loss of consortium and funeral expenses, etc. Total sum payable to claimants is Rs. 6,30,000.Over and above this amount, appellants shall be entitled for interest at the rate of seven per cent on the enhanced amount of compensation from the date of award.

6. Appellant Nos. 2 to 6 are minors. Therefore, we direct that the amount of compensation be deposited in a nationalised bank and claimants will be entitled for monthly interest.

7. The appeal succeeds and is allowed with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial