Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sarita Vs. Dilip

Sarita vs Dilip

Disposition Revision dismissed Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 28, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/511736

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Revision No. 159 of 2002
Subject
Civil
Disposition
Revision dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil
Outcome / disposition
Revision dismissed
Acts & sections
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 7, Rule 11

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sarita

Advocate M.A. Bohara, Adv.

Respondent

Dilip

Advocate O.P. Sharma, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 7, Rule 11
Cases Referred
Divya and Ors. v. Dinesh Kushzvaha.
Reported In
I(2003)DMC393

Excerpt

- ordera.k. gohil, j.1. no revision is maintainable against the rejection of amendment application which is an interlocutory order. the trial court has also rejected the application filed under order vii rule 11 of the code about the maintainability of the suit. the husband has filed suit for declaration that he has obtained divorce as per the prevailing custom in his caste which is fully established. the trial court has held that such a suit is maintainable placing reliance on the decision in the case of p. mariammal v. padmanabhan, air 2001 madras 350.2. learned counsel for respondent submitted that this court has also taken similar view in the order passed on 7.8.2002 in civil revision no. 160 of 2002, sandhya @ divya and ors. v. dinesh kushzvaha.3. accordingly it is held that the suit is maintainable and the trial court has rightly rejected the objections filed on behalf of the applicants/defendants.4. consequently this revision has no merits and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. trial court record be returned back immediately. both the parties are directed to appear before the trial court on 7.10.2002 for further proceedings in the suit. in view of the aforesaid order, m.(c)p. no. 300/2002 stands disposed of.c.c. to both in 3 days on payment of usual charges.

Full Judgment

ORDER

A.K. Gohil, J.

1. No revision is maintainable against the rejection of amendment application which is an interlocutory order. The Trial Court has also rejected the application filed Under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code about the maintainability of the suit. The husband has filed suit for declaration that he has obtained divorce as per the prevailing custom in his caste which is fully established. The Trial Court has held that such a suit is maintainable placing reliance on the decision in the case of P. Mariammal v. Padmanabhan, AIR 2001 Madras 350.

2. Learned Counsel for respondent submitted that this Court has also taken similar view in the order passed on 7.8.2002 in Civil Revision No. 160 of 2002, Sandhya @ Divya and Ors. v. Dinesh Kushzvaha.

3. Accordingly it is held that the suit is maintainable and the Trial Court has rightly rejected the objections filed on behalf of the applicants/defendants.

4. Consequently this revision has no merits and is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. Trial Court record be returned back immediately. Both the parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 7.10.2002 for further proceedings in the suit. In view of the aforesaid order, M.(C)P. No. 300/2002 stands disposed of.

C.C. to both in 3 days on payment of usual charges.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial