Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajkumar Sharma Vs. Laxmi Sharma

Rajkumar Sharma vs Laxmi Sharma

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 23, 1998
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/504660

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
First Appeal No. 319 of 1996
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1890.Sections 307 & 324: [Lokeshwar Singh Panta & B.Sudershan Reddy,JJ] Assault Proof - Appellant allegedly dealt sickle blow to deceased - Testimony of eye-witnesses showed that sudden altercation ensued between appellant and deceased - No evidence to indicate any previous enmity between parti...

Key legal issue
Family
Acts & sections
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24, 28 and 29

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajkumar Sharma

Respondent

Laxmi Sharma

Legal References

Acts
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24, 28 and 29
Reported In
II(1999)DMC126

Excerpt

- indian penal code, 1890.sections 307 & 324: [lokeshwar singh panta & b.sudershan reddy,jj] assault proof - appellant allegedly dealt sickle blow to deceased - testimony of eye-witnesses showed that sudden altercation ensued between appellant and deceased - no evidence to indicate any previous enmity between parties - single blow of sickle had been inflicted by appellant on back of deceased - incised wound allegedly inflicted by appellant - however opinion of doctor proved that deceased had not died due to direct result of said injury held, appellant is therefore liable to be convicted under section 324 of i.p.c., sentence of 3 years imprisonment reduced to period undergone by appellant considering mental agony suffered by him - the re-conciliation efforts failed. 4. the learned counsel appearing for the husband in this appeal submits that the husband, because of his poor financial condition, could not clear all the arrears of maintenance and could get no opportunity to prove that he is entitled to a decree of divorce against the wife on the ground alleged by him in his divorce petition......the husband, who is present in court with his counsel is true. this court, however, directs the husband to clear arrears, if any, outstanding towards maintenance. 5. in the circumstances, this court considers it fit to set aside the judgment dated 8.7.1996 passed by the court and send the matter for re-trial to the learned judge who shall re-register the divorce petition but would proceed with the trial only after verifying on affidavits to be produced by the parties in trial court that all arrears of maintenance payable under section 24 of the act have been cleared. 6. consequently, the appeal only succeeds to the extent of setting aside the judgment and remitting the case for re-trial on the condition of the husband paying full amount of arrears of maintenance under section 24 of the act to the wife. if within a period of two months from the date of this order, the husband does not clear all arrears of maintenance to the satisfaction of the trial court, the divorce petition shall stand dismissed and the case shall be consigned to record room. the husband shall appear in the trial court on........to satisfy the court of full payment of arrears of maintenance and the wife shall thereafter be noticed to appear and take part in the proceedings. the parties shall bear their own costs.

Full Judgment

D.M. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. This is an appeal by the husband under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the Judgment dated 8.7.1996 of the Court of 5th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, whereby his petition filed for divorce against the wife has been dismissed only on the ground of non-payment of full amount of interim maintenance, and litigation expenses to the wife as ordered in proceedings under Section 24 of the Act.

2. In this Court also directions were issued on 6.3.1998 for payment of arrears of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 350/- per month and to pay a sum of Rs. 500/- as litigation charges.

3. On 20.4.1998 the couple was called by the Court for efforts of re-conciliation. The husband refused to accept the wife to his house stating that she is an abnormal person although this Court, when questioned her found no apparent abnormality. The re-conciliation efforts failed.

4. The learned Counsel appearing for the husband in this appeal submits that the husband, because of his poor financial condition, could not clear all the arrears of maintenance and could get no opportunity to prove that he is entitled to a decree of divorce against the wife on the ground alleged by him in his divorce petition. The husband has filed an affidavit in this Court mentioning certain figures to be the amount of arrears which have been paid. He has also undertaken to pay the balance, if any. The wife is not present in Court nor her Counsel. It is not possible for this Court, therefore, to verify whether the statement made by the husband, who is present in Court with his Counsel is true. This Court, however, directs the husband to clear arrears, if any, outstanding towards maintenance.

5. In the circumstances, this Court considers it fit to set aside the Judgment dated 8.7.1996 passed by the Court and send the matter for re-trial to the learned Judge who shall re-register the divorce petition but would proceed with the Trial only after verifying on affidavits to be produced by the parties in Trial Court that all arrears of maintenance payable under Section 24 of the Act have been cleared.

6. Consequently, the appeal only succeeds to the extent of setting aside the Judgment and remitting the case for re-trial on the condition of the husband paying full amount of arrears of maintenance under Section 24 of the Act to the wife. If within a period of two months from the date of this order, the husband does not clear all arrears of maintenance to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, the divorce petition shall stand dismissed and the case shall be consigned to record room. The husband shall appear in the Trial Court on........to satisfy the Court of full payment of arrears of maintenance and the wife shall thereafter be noticed to appear and take part in the proceedings. The parties shall bear their own costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial