Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devel Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Devel Sharma and ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 03, 2005
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/498567

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No. 3737/2004
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Constitution

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devel Sharma and ors.

Advocate Aditya Sanghi, Adv.

Respondent

State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Advocate R.S. Jha, A.A.G. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Adv. and ;Shashank Verma, Adv. for the Respondent No. 4

Legal References

Reported In
2005(2)MPHT106; 2005(2)MPLJ4

Excerpt

- .....or by the supreme court where the matter is stated to be pending.4. the petitioners agree that the petition may be disposed of on the terms agreed subject to their right to claim further refund, if the fee fixation committee or the supreme court reduces the fee fixed by the committee.5. in view of the above, we dispose of the petition with the following directions :--(a) the fourth respondent shall appropriate rs. 3,28,000/-(that is rs. 1,64,000/- per year for 2003-2004 and 2004-2005) and rs. 25,000/- towards refundable caution money and rs. 1,000/- as student fund as per the fees fixed by the committee (and hostel fee in the case of students staying the college hostel) and refund the balance out of rs. 4,28,000/- to each of the petitioners. such excess shall be refunded to the petitioners within two months from this date.(b) the tuition fee, caution money and hostel fee paid/payable shall be subject to further final orders that may be passed by the fee fixation committee or orders of the supreme court. depending on such orders, either petitioners will pay the deficit or fourth respondent college will refund the excess.(c) the petition as against respondent nos. 1 to 3 is dismissed.(d) the parties to bear their respective costs.

Full Judgment

ORDER

R.V. Raveendran, C.J.

1. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 44 in this petition have been admitted to R.D. Gardi Medical College, Ujjain (fourth respondent) to M.B.B.S. Course during academic year 2003-2004. Each of them claims to have paid a sum of Rs. 4,28,000/-(towards fee, caution money and other charges) at the time of admission to the M.B.B.S. Course, to the fourth respondent College.

2. The Committee for fixation of fee for professional Institutions has passed an order fixing the annual fee for admission to fourth respondent College as follows :--

Description Fee per annumTuition Fee : Rs. 1,64,000/-Student Fund : Rs. 1,000/-Caution Money : Rs. 25,000/-Deposit for College(Refundable)Hostel Fees : Rs. 6,000/-Caution Money (Hostel) : Rs. 1,200/-(Refundable)

The petitioners contend that the amount received in excess should be refunded to them. As it was not refunded, the petitioners have filed this petition seeking a direction to the fourth respondent not to charge fee in excess what has been fixed by the Fee Fixation Committee and for refund of the excess amount charged (or for adjustment thereof towards tuition fee for subsequent year). They have also sought direction to the State to monitor the fee structure for session year 2004-2005 and subsequent year also.

3. The fourth respondent has filed a return. It has not disputed the fee structure fixed by the Committee. It has also admitted having received Rs. 4,28,000/- from each petitioner, made up as follows :--

Tuition fee : Rs. 3,50,000/-Library Fee : Rs. 10,000/-Caution Money : Rs. 60,000/-Hostel Fee : Rs. 8,000/-_______________Rs. 4,28,000/-_______________

The fourth respondent College is ready to refund the amount received in excess of what is fixed by the Committee or adjust the excess amount towards the fees for the subsequent year, subject, however, to their right to claim any difference if a higher fee is fixed finally by the Fee Fixation Committee or by the Supreme Court where the matter is stated to be pending.

4. The petitioners agree that the petition may be disposed of on the terms agreed subject to their right to claim further refund, if the Fee Fixation Committee or the Supreme Court reduces the fee fixed by the Committee.

5. In view of the above, we dispose of the petition with the following directions :--

(a) The fourth respondent shall appropriate Rs. 3,28,000/-(that is Rs. 1,64,000/- per year for 2003-2004 and 2004-2005) and Rs. 25,000/- towards refundable caution money and Rs. 1,000/- as student fund as per the fees fixed by the Committee (and Hostel fee in the case of students staying the College Hostel) and refund the balance out of Rs. 4,28,000/- to each of the petitioners. Such excess shall be refunded to the petitioners within two months from this date.

(b) The tuition fee, caution money and hostel fee paid/payable shall be subject to further final orders that may be passed by the Fee Fixation Committee or orders of the Supreme Court. Depending on such orders, either petitioners will pay the deficit or fourth respondent College will refund the excess.

(c) The petition as against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 is dismissed.

(d) The parties to bear their respective costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial