Laxminarayan Giri and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Laxminarayan Giri and ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Chhattisgarh Decided Apr 16, 2001

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/496644

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/496644
Court: Chhattisgarh High Court
Judge: W.A. Shishak, C.J. and; R.S. Garg, J.
Decided On: Apr 16, 2001
Case Number: Cr. A. No. 2441 of 2000
Subject: Family;Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount for her appearance before the Registry of this Court on 11th September, 2001. Thereafter the appellant No.

Key legal issue: Family;Criminal
Acts & sections: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 498A

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Laxminarayan Giri and ors.

Advocate Arun Kochar, Adv.

Respondent

State of Madhya Pradesh

Advocate Ranbir Singh, G.A.; Sunil Sinha, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indian Panel Code, 1860 - Sections 34, 302 and 498A
Reported In: II(2001)DMC340

Excerpt

- - 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount for her appearance before the registry of this court on 11th september, 2001. thereafter the appellant no.order1. the said application has been made for appellant no. 2 (ramlal) and no. 3 (jundribai). learned counsel for the appellant submits that the application for appellant no. 2 has become infructuous in view of his death. the application so far as it relates to appellant no. 2 is concerned, is rejected. however, learned counsel for the state may, verify from the concerned police station about the date of death of the appellant no. 2 within a period of four weeks and place the information on record.2. taking into consideration the age of the appellant no. 3 which is shown to be about 75 years and further that she is a woman we are of the opinion that appellant no. 3 for this only reason deserves to be released on bail. the application for the appellant no. 3 jundribai is allowed.3. the substantive jail sentence awarded to the appellant no. 3 is suspended and she is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount for her appearance before the registry of this court on 11th september, 2001. thereafter the appellant no. 3 shall appear before the trial court on the date given to her in this behalf by the registry of this court and thereafter shall appear on all dates as may be given to her by the said court in this behalf with an interval of six months till the disposal of this appeal.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. The said application has been made for appellant No. 2 (Ramlal) and No. 3 (Jundribai). Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the application for appellant No. 2 has become infructuous in view of his death. The application so far as it relates to appellant No. 2 is concerned, is rejected. However, learned Counsel for the State may, verify from the concerned police station about the date of death of the appellant No. 2 within a period of four weeks and place the information on record.

2. Taking into consideration the age of the appellant No. 3 which is shown to be about 75 years and further that she is a woman we are of the opinion that appellant No. 3 for this only reason deserves to be released on bail. The application for the appellant No. 3 Jundribai is allowed.

3. The substantive jail sentence awarded to the appellant No. 3 is suspended and she is directed to be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety in the like amount for her appearance before the Registry of this Court on 11th September, 2001. Thereafter the appellant No. 3 shall appear before the Trial Court on the date given to her in this behalf by the Registry of this Court and thereafter shall appear on all dates as may be given to her by the said Court in this behalf with an interval of six months till the disposal of this appeal.

Same Court & Year Chhattisgarh · 2001 Same Parties Laxminarayan Giri and ors. vs State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Family;Criminal Same Judge W.A. Shishak, C.J. and; R.S. Garg, J. Acts & Sections Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Indi...

Family;Criminal