Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Asharfi Devi and ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar and anr.

Asharfi Devi and ors. vs Vinod Kumar and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jul 12, 2006
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/495307

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 [C.A. No. 45/1860]. Section 302; [M.C. Jain, R.C. Deepak & K.K. Misra, JJ] Murder Plea as to accused being minor School register and transfer certificate not proved before Court according to law Held, It has to be ignored and question of age is to be determined on other evidence and cir...

Key legal issue
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Asharfi Devi and ors.

Respondent

Vinod Kumar and anr.

Advocate Mr. S.A. Murtuza

Legal References

Reported In
I(2007)ACC774

Excerpt

- indian penal code, 1860 [c.a. no. 45/1860]. section 302; [m.c. jain, r.c. deepak & k.k. misra, jj] murder plea as to accused being minor school register and transfer certificate not proved before court according to law held, it has to be ignored and question of age is to be determined on other evidence and circumstances surfacing on record. age determined on the basis of x-ray plates and report prepared by c.m.o., is the correct age of accused. accused was declared to be child on the date of commission of offence of murder. however, considering fact that now accused was around 41 years, he cannot be sent to approved school. accused was directed to pay fine of rs.25,000/- under section 302 i.p.c., amount of fine was directed to be paid as compensation to wife of deceased. mohammadorder1. heard learned counsel for the appellants and mr. s.a. murtuza, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1.2. it has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that the income of the deceased was rs. 6,000 per month. this fact has not been taken into consideration, rather his income has been held to be rs. 1,300 per month. it is held that the income of the deceased was rs. 1,500 per month and the compensation be awarded accordingly and the same may be paid to the claimants from the date of award along with interest.3. the excess amount that we have directed to be paid to the claimant-appellants be paid expeditiously preferably within a period of three months.4. in these circumstances, the appeal is allowed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and Mr. S.A. Murtuza, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1.

2. It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that the income of the deceased was Rs. 6,000 per month. This fact has not been taken into consideration, rather his income has been held to be Rs. 1,300 per month. It is held that the income of the deceased was Rs. 1,500 per month and the compensation be awarded accordingly and the same may be paid to the claimants from the date of award along with interest.

3. The excess amount that we have directed to be paid to the claimant-appellants be paid expeditiously preferably within a period of three months.

4. In these circumstances, the appeal is allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial