Balkeshwar Maurya and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

.....the provisions of land acquisition act, 1894. it would, however, be open to the court in exercise of that power to invite the attention of the executive to any public purpose and the need for land for meeting that public purpose and to require the executive to take a decision, even a reasoned decision, with regard to the same in accordance with the statutory provisions, perhaps even within a reasonable time frame. however, the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. order1. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned government counsel.2. the petitioner is challenging the impugned f.i.r. dated 4-7-2002. annexure 4 to the writ petition under sections 147/148/323/504/506/308, i.p.c. and 3(1)(x) sc/st act of p. s. phulpur, district allahabad.3. a perusal of the impugned f.i.r. shows that the allegations therein are that at about 4 a.m. on 11-5-2002 the first information who is 'pasi' by caste was sleeping outside his house when the petitioners who are mostly brahmans by caste came there and woke up the first informant and took him away and on the way started beating him with lathis and abusing him. the first informant became unconscious and fell down due to these beatings. the petitioners abused the first informant saying that he was 'pasi' by caste and yet he is not doing 'begari' for the petitioners. due to this beating the right hand of the first informant is still not functioning. the first informant tried to lodge f.i.r. at the police station but the police did not lodge it for a long time.4. the caste system is a curse on indian society and because of this our nation has not been able to progress much. we are not indians today, rather we are brahmans, thakurs, yadavs, muslims, harijans etc. i.e. divided on caste and communal lines. unless the caste system is destroyed we cannot unite and our nation cannot progress. hence, the caste system is an enemy of our nation. out of the six petitioners five of them are brahmins and they behaved in a barbaric manner by insisting that the first informant who is 'pasi' by caste must do 'begari' for them otherwise he will be beaten up. begari has been specifically prohibited by article 23 of the constitution. it is nothing but a form of slavery. this is the age of democracy and if the so-called upper castes think that they can force the so-called lower castes to do whatever they want the time has come that they must be made to change their thinking completely, as this kind of.....