Lal Singh Vs. State of U.P.

.....to the same in accordance with the statutory provisions, perhaps even within a reasonable time frame. however, the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. - diviyapur, district auraiya shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.orderm.l. singhal, j.1. i have heard learned counsel for the accused applicant and the learned a.g.a. for the state.2. the applicant, is an elder brother of the husband of the deceased. there are general allegations of the demand of dowry. it has been argued on behalf of the applicant that the applicant is living separately. the marriage took-place 21/2 years age.3. the accused applicant lal singh in case crime no. 198 of 1998 under sections 304b, 201, 498a, 302, i.p.c. and 3/4 d. p. act, p.s. diviyapur, district auraiya shall be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.