Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nand Kumar Vs. State of U.P.

Nand Kumar vs State of U.P.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Feb 18, 1999
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/489977

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Cri. Misc. Bail Appln. No. 1919 of 1999
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894]. Section 4; [Sushil Harkauli, S.K. Singh & Krishna Murari, JJ] Acquisition of land Held, Court cannot issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the State Authorities to acquire a particular land. Land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive No...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 324, 504 and 506

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nand Kumar

Advocate V.P. Tripathi, Adv.

Respondent

State of U.P.

Advocate Govt. Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 324, 504 and 506
Reported In
1999CriLJ2339

Excerpt

.....accordance with the statutory provisions, perhaps even within a reasonable time frame. however, the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. - , police station tewaripur, district gorakhpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.orderm.l. singhal, j.1. the accused-applicant nand kumar has applied for bail under sections 302, 324, 504, and 506, i.p.c. i have heard the learned counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned a.g.a. for the state.2. the role assigned to the accused-applicant is of exhortation only.3. let the accused-applicant nand kumar, involved in case crime no. 210 of 1998, under sections 302, 324, 504, and 506, i.p.c., police station tewaripur, district gorakhpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate concerned.

Full Judgment

ORDER

M.L. Singhal, J.

1. The accused-applicant Nand Kumar has applied for bail under Sections 302, 324, 504, and 506, I.P.C. I have heard the learned counsel for the accused-applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The role assigned to the accused-applicant is of exhortation only.

3. Let the accused-applicant Nand Kumar, involved in Case Crime No. 210 of 1998, under Sections 302, 324, 504, and 506, I.P.C., Police Station Tewaripur, District Gorakhpur, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial