Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sushil Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P.

Sushil Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P.

Disposition Petition allowed Court Allahabad Decided Jun 01, 2001
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/488291

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Misc. Case No. 2206 of 2001(B)
Subject
Criminal
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894]. Section 4; [Sushil Harkauli, S.K. Singh & Krishna Murari, JJ] Acquisition of land Held, Court cannot issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the State Authorities to acquire a particular land. Land acquisition is not purely ministerial act to be performed by executive No...

Key legal issue
Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
Evidence Act - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushil Kumar Yadav

Advocate R.B. Singh, Adv.

Respondent

State of U.P.

Advocate Govt. Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Evidence Act - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 396
Reported In
2002CriLJ618

Excerpt

.....frame. however, the power of the court under article 226 must necessarily stop at that. thereafter, if the decision taken by the executive is capable of challenge and, there exist appropriate legal grounds for such challenge, it may also be open to the court to quash the decision and to require reconsideration. but no direction in the nature of mandamus whether interim or final can be issued by the court under article 226 to the executive to necessarily acquire a particular area of a particular piece of land for a particular public purpose. section 4; compulsory acquisition of land powers of state government held, renewal of lease in favour of petitioners would not take away power of state government of compulsory acquisition of land. renewal of lease would at best be taken into consideration for determining quantum of compensation. - gurubuxganj, district rae bareli, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, rae bareli. it cannot better be expressed in a language than the one that has already been done. it appears that in the state the law and order situation is going from bad to wors (sic) not for nothing......away. no law is meant for the police to adhere to. it prefers more its flouting than adherence to and the senior police officials appear to have turned a blind eye to the situation. apparently the junior police officials, from these situations and facts, appear to have been colluding with the criminals. no other proof is required to establish the nexus between them and the criminals. in the circumstances, this court finds no alternative but to release this applicant on bail.3. let, therefore, the applicant involved in case crime no. 62 of 2000 under sections 396, ipc, p.s. gurubuxganj, district rae bareli, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, rae bareli.4. let a copy of this order be sent to the secretary (home), government of u.p., lucknow. the chief minister of the state, and the director general of police of the state (u.p.) to apprise them about the situation that is prevailing regarding investigation of the cases with a cherished hope that they will take corrective measures in this direction. it is futile to suggest taking of any action against these errant police officials. no harsher language than the above can be used. repeatedly i have been writing in my orders about these latches inviting attentions of the superior police officials of the state to know the result of my orders from them. this is a state of anguish. it cannot better be expressed in a language than the one that has already been done. it appears that in the state the law and order situation is going from bad to wors (sic) not for nothing. the police officials have already a larger responsibility to owe for the situation. it is not that all the junior officials are at wrong. these senior officials are required to submit a report to this court as to what action has been taken by them against the erring police officials and what are the directions that have been issued to the.....

Full Judgment

ORDER

S.K. Agarwal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

2. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that after the arrest of the applicant some cash was recovered from his possession which was not subjected to identification, as required by Section 9 of the Evidence Act. The informant was summoned and he was made to say that these are those very notes, although none of them bear any specific mark of identification. No such mark is adverted to in the FIR on these notes. The applicant was also not subjected to any physical identification, as adverted to above about the property. The investigative process in the State appears to have gone completely away. No law is meant for the police to adhere to. It prefers more its flouting than adherence to and the senior police officials appear to have turned a blind eye to the situation. Apparently the junior police officials, from these situations and facts, appear to have been colluding with the criminals. No other proof is required to establish the nexus between them and the criminals. In the circumstances, this Court finds no alternative but to release this applicant on bail.

3. Let, therefore, the applicant involved in case Crime No. 62 of 2000 under Sections 396, IPC, P.S. Gurubuxganj, District Rae Bareli, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rae Bareli.

4. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Secretary (Home), Government of U.P., Lucknow. The Chief Minister of the State, and the Director General of Police of the State (U.P.) to apprise them about the situation that is prevailing regarding investigation of the cases with a cherished hope that they will take corrective measures in this direction. It is futile to suggest taking of any action against these errant police officials. No harsher language than the above can be used. Repeatedly I have been writing in my orders about these latches inviting attentions of the superior police officials of the State to know the result of my orders from them. This is a state of anguish. It cannot better be expressed in a language than the one that has already been done. It appears that in the State the law and order situation is going from bad to wors (sic) not for nothing. The police officials have already a larger responsibility to owe for the situation. It is not that all the junior officials are at wrong. These senior officials are required to submit a report to this Court as to what action has been taken by them against the erring police officials and what are the directions that have been issued to the investigating officers of each district of the State in such matters.

5. Let a copy of this order be also supplied to the learned Government Advocate free of cost so that he may take necessary steps at his end to apprise the Government of these serious lapses.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial