Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.K Varshney Vs. Principal, Our Lady of Fatima Higher Secondary School, Aligarh and Others, Jj.

S.K Varshney vs Principal, Our Lady of Fatima Higher Secondary School, Aligarh and Others, Jj.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Sep 15, 1999
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/486493

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Special Appeal No. 463 of 1999
Subject
Constitution

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Constitution - termination of service - Articles 30 (1) and 226 of Constitution of India and Section 16G of U. P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - service of petitioner terminated - no writ lies against a private and minority institution - prior approval not necessary before termination as provided in Article 30 o...

Key legal issue
Constitution
Acts & sections
Constitution of India - Articles 30, 30(1) and 226; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.K Varshney

Advocate S.F.A. Naqvi, Adv.

Respondent

Principal, Our Lady of Fatima Higher Secondary School, Aligarh and Others, Jj.

Legal References

Acts
Constitution of India - Articles 30, 30(1) and 226; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G
Cases Referred
J. K. Kalra v. R. I. G. S..
Reported In
1999(4)AWC3244

Excerpt

constitution - termination of service - articles 30 (1) and 226 of constitution of india and section 16g of u. p. intermediate education act, 1921 - service of petitioner terminated - no writ lies against a private and minority institution - prior approval not necessary before termination as provided in article 30 of constitution of india. - - . 1996 (3) uplbec 169, is no longer good law.n. k. mitra c.j. and m. katju, j.1. this special appeal has beenfiled against the judgment passed by the learned single judge dated 26.5.99.2. we entirely agree with the learned single judge who has held that the institution our lady of fatima higher secondary school. ramghat, aligarh, is a private body and hence no writ lies against it. we are also of the opinion that no writ lies against the said institution because it is a minority institution and as held by the supreme court in yunus ali shah v. mohd. abdul kalam and others, jt 1999 (3) sc 32, it was not necessary to take prior approval of any authority before terminating the service of the appellant, in view of article 30 of the constitution. in committee of management v. raj kumar shukla and others, special appeal no. 298 of 1999, decided by us on 15.9.99, we have held that in view of the aforesaid decision of the supreme court, the full bench decision of this court in j. k. kalra v. r. i. g. s.. 1996 (3) uplbec 169, is no longer good law.3. hence for both these reasons, this appeal is not maintainable.4. the appeal is dismissed.

Full Judgment

N. K. Mitra C.J. and M. Katju, J.

1. This Special Appeal has beenfiled against the judgment passed by the learned single Judge dated 26.5.99.

2. We entirely agree with the learned single Judge who has held that the institution Our Lady of Fatima Higher Secondary School. Ramghat, Aligarh, is a private body and hence no writ lies against it. We are also of the opinion that no writ lies against the said institution because it is a minority institution and as held by the Supreme Court in Yunus Ali Shah v. Mohd. Abdul Kalam and others, JT 1999 (3) SC 32, it was not necessary to take prior approval of any authority before terminating the service of the appellant, in view of Article 30 of the Constitution. In Committee of Management v. Raj Kumar Shukla and others, Special Appeal No. 298 of 1999, decided by us on 15.9.99, we have held that in view of the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court, the Full Bench decision of this Court in J. K. Kalra v. R. I. G. S.. 1996 (3) UPLBEC 169, is no longer good law.

3. Hence for both these reasons, this appeal is not maintainable.

4. The Appeal is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial